ArticleTranslational cancer research2021
Prognostic value of combined pretreatment fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in digestive system cancers: a meta-analysis of 17 retrospective studies.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral epidemiological studies have reported the relationship between the combined pretreatment fibrinogen and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (F-NLR) and prognosis of digestive system cancers (DSCs). However, the results are controversial. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of F-NLR in patients with DSCs.
methodsA comprehensive search for relevant studies was conducted until June, 2020. Studies that evaluated the association of the F-NLR score with survival outcome in patients with any DSCs were included. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. All data analyses were performed using the STATA 12.0 software.
resultsA total of 17 studies involving 5,767 participants were included in the meta-analysis. We found that high F-NLR score was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) in patients with DSCs (HR =2.0; 95% CI, 1.78-2.24). In addition, patients with high F-NLR score had poor disease-free survival/progression-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/PFS/RFS) (HR =2.01; 95% CI, 1.47-2.74) and DFS (HR =1.97; 95% CI, 1.35-2.87). Sensitivity analyses for OS confirmed that the results were stable.
conclusionsHigh F-NLR score is significantly associated with poor prognostic outcomes in patients with DSCs and can serve as an effective prognostic indicator for the Asian population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.