Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116228›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2022

Update on the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Rafael Antonio Medina López, Ines Rivero Belenchon, Javier Mazuecos-Quirós, Carmen Belén Congregado-Ruíz, Felipe Couñago

Open access · diamondAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael Antonio Medina LópezDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Biomedical Institute of Seville/CSIC/University of Seville, Sevilla 41013, Spain.
Ines Rivero BelenchonDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville 41005, Spain. ines.rivero.belenchon@gmail.com.
Javier Mazuecos-QuirósDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Biomedical Institute of Seville/CSIC/University of Seville, Sevilla 41013, Spain.
Carmen Belén Congregado-RuízDepartment of Urology and Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Biomedical Institute of Seville/CSIC/University of Seville, Sevilla 41013, Spain.
Felipe CouñagoRadiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28223, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) management has undergone a paradigm shift in recent decades. The first revolution came with the emergence of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors; there was a second wave with the unprecedented success of checkpoint inhibitors, and then the latest approach, which is becoming the new care standard in mRCC, of combining these two strategies in different ways. Updated results of Checkmate-214 after 42 mo of follow-up were consistent with previously published results showing the superiority of nivolumab/ipilimumab over sunitinib in progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate and high-risk patients. However, several studies presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 suggested that the best place, and so far, the only one for nivolumab/ipilimumab is the frontline setting. The update on Keynote-426 after 23 mo of follow-up showed no superiority of pembroli-zumab/axitinib over sunitinib in favorable-risk mRCC, suggesting that it should no longer be the first line of choice in low-risk patients. Finally, the phase III Checkmate 9ER trial results revealed the superiority of nivolumab/cabozantinib

Indexed as

AntiangiogenicBiomarkersImmune checkpoint inhibitorsMetastatic renal cell carcinomaSystemic treatmentUpdate

Identifiers

PMID35116228
PMCPMC8790301
OpenAlexW4206901613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.