Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35116197›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Ecosystem design as an avenue for improving services provided by carbonate producing marine ecosystems.

Hildegard Westphal, Gary N Murphy, Steve S Doo, Thomas Mann, Alexander Petrovic, Christiane Schmidt, Marleen Stuhr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Environmental Galenics: large-scale fortification of extant microbiomes with engineered bioremediation agents.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hildegard Westphal *Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.
Gary N Murphy *Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.
Steve S DooLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.
Thomas MannBundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), Hannover, Germany.
Alexander PetrovicKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Christiane SchmidtLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.
Marleen StuhrLeibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem Design (ED) is an approach for constructing habitats that places human needs for ecosystem services at the center of intervention, with the overarching goal of establishing self-sustaining habitats which require limited management. This concept was originally developed for use in mangrove ecosystems, and is understandably controversial, as it markedly diverges from other protection approaches that assign human use a minor priority or exclude it. However, the advantage of ED lies within the considered implementation of these designed ecosystems, thus preserving human benefits from potential later disturbances. Here, we outline the concept of ED in tropical carbonate depositional systems and discuss potential applications to aid ecosystem services such as beach nourishment and protection of coastlines and reef islands at risk from environmental and climate change, CO

Indexed as

Coral ReefsEcosystemCarbonatesClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesHumansCarbonatesCarbonate productionCoastal erosionCoastal protectionConservationCoral healthCoral reef islandsEcosystem designRestorationSea-level changeSequestration

Identifiers

PMID35116197
PMCPMC8784016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.