ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2021
Circulating interleukin-17A in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- IL-6 and lL-17 as potential biomarkers for premature coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- DNA Methylation of the IL-17A Gene Promoter Is Associated with Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Coronary Artery Disease: The Genetics of Atherosclerotic Disease Mexican Study.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInterleukin 17 (IL-17) is produced by Th17 and other cells. It is debatable whether IL-17 is atherogenic or atheroprotective. The role of this interleukin in the development and progression of coronary artery disease is unknown. Our aim was to evaluate if there were differences in serum IL-17A levels according to to clinical presentation of coronary artery disease.
methodsThis cross-sectional study enrolled 101 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 100 patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), and 70 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected from patients and controls (within 48 h) to analyze IL-17A levels. Clinical characteristics were recorded using questionnaires. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee.
resultsComparisons of the clinical characteristics between patients with ACS and CCS revealed the following: mean age (62 ± 12.4 years vs. 63.3 ± 9.8 years, P = 0.4), male (63.4% vs. 58%, P = 0.4), hypertension (85.1% vs. 79%, P = 0.1), dyslipidemia (48% vs. 31%, P = 0.01), diabetes mellitus (47.5% vs. 41%, P = 0.3), previous myocardial infarction (57.4% vs. 40%, P = 0.01), and smoking (29.7% vs. 38%, P = 1). The peripheral concentrations of IL-17A in ACS, CCS and controls were 5.36 ± 8.83, 6.69 ± 17.92, and 6.26 ± 11.13, respectively, with P = 0.6. In addition, the comparison between ACS and CCS showed: 5.36 ± 8.83 vs. 6.69 ± 17.92%, P = 0.3.
conclusionThe main finding of this study was that circulating IL-17 levels were similar in patients with ACS, CCS, and healthy volunteers. In addition, there was no difference between patients with ACS and those with CCS. Therefore, in patients with ACS and CCS, circulating IL-17A concentrations are low and there were no differences between patients with coronary artery disease and healthy individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35116182PMC8784676W4210821802What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.