ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology2022
Combined antrum and corpus biopsy protocol improves
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- High Levels ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial and Synergistic Activity of Metformin AgainstThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance inInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- The second Irish Helicobacter pylori Working Group consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult patients in Ireland.European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024Article
- Review
- Management of Helicobacter pylori infection in paediatric patients in Europe: results from the EuroPedHp Registry.Infection · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
aimTo determine whether dual antrum and corpus biopsy sampling is superior to single antrum biopsy sampling for
methodsThe study received ethical approval from the joint research ethics committee of Tallaght University Hospital and St. James's Hospital. Patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were invited to participate. Biopsies were collected in tubes containing Dent's transport medium and patient demographics were recorded. Biopsies were used to inoculate Colombia blood agar plates. Plates were incubated under microaerobic conditions and evaluated for the presence of
resultsIn all, samples from 219
conclusionCombined corpus and antrum biopsy sampling improves
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.