ArticleRoyal Society open science2022
Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A worldwide itinerary of research ethics in science for a better social responsibility and justice: a bibliometric analysis and review.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Pooled it
- Open Science, Health Data and Epistemic Harms: A Multidisciplinary Reflection.Data science journal · 2026Article
- Open science practices in behavioral addictions: An exploratory survey.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2026Article
- Advocating the potential of artificial intelligence for syndrome discovery in syndromic surveillance systems: A scoping review.iScience · 2026Review
- The billion-dollar case for sustaining palaeontology's digital databases.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Unlocking the benefits of transparent and reusable science for climate risk management.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- What helps and hinders reproducible research? Researchers' perspectives from a cross-disciplinary interview study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Open science and epistemic equity: opportunities and challenges in the contemporary research ecosystem.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Priced out of belonging? Insufficient concessions on membership fees across international societies in ecology and evolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India.PloS one · 2025Article
- Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities.Quantitative science studies · 2025Article
- Reimagining open science for global health: Epistemic power and the pursuit of health equity.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Volume isn't openness: misaligned assessment and Open Science adoption in Ecuador.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Article
- Diverse sources of normativity in open science and their implications for ethical governance.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values.Accountability in research · 2024Article
- The societal impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science.PLoS biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open Science holds the promise to make scientific endeavours more inclusive, participatory, understandable, accessible and re-usable for large audiences. However, making processes open will not
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.