ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral microbiome dynamics in head and neck cancer patients undergoing oral healthcare: implications for prognosis and early diagnosis.BMC microbiology · 2025Trial
- Cross-disciplinary communication between oral and gut microbiota in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Oral Microbiome as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic Profile of Oral Cancer Lesions: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study of FFPE Tissue Sections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- HPV Infection and Oral Microbiota: Interactions and Future Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Is Short-Read 16S rRNA Sequencing of Oral Microbiome Sampling a Suitable Diagnostic Tool for Head and Neck Cancer?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Promising dawn in tumor microenvironment therapy: engineering oral bacteria.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Mechanisms of crosstalk between the oropharyngeal microbiome and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal carcinogenesis: a mini review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Investigating the oral microbiome in retrospective and prospective cases of prostate, colon, and breast cancer.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2023Article
- Altered oral microbiome in Sudanese Toombak smokeless tobacco users carries a newly emerging risk of squamous cell carcinoma development and progression.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Oral Microbiome as Mediator between Oral Hygiene and Its Impact on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Oral microbiomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE): a comparative pilot study of IE patients, patients at risk for IE and healthy controls.Journal of oral microbiology · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) is a known etiological factor of oropharyngeal head and neck cancer (HNC). HPV positivity and periodontal disease have been associated with higher HNC risk, suggesting a role for oral bacterial species. Our objective was to determine oral microbiome profiles in HNC patients (HPV-positive and HPV-negative) and in healthy controls (HC).
methodsSaliva samples and swabs of buccal mucosa, supragingival plaque, and tongue were collected from HNC patients (
resultsHNC vs. HC and HNC HPV+ vs. HNC HPV- β-diversities differed significantly (pMonte Carlo < 0.05).
conclusionOral microbiome profiles of HNC HPV+ and HNC HPV- patients differed significantly regarding periodontal-associated species. Our results suggest that oral bacterial species (e.g.,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.