ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2021
Cognitive Networks (
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of promoting factors on learning by four different delivery modes.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Cross-region neuron co-firing mediated by ripple oscillations supports distributed working memory representations.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Short-Term Nociceptive Memory: Reduced Discriminability and Multiple Encoding Biases.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Multiplexed changes in synaptic transmission underlie stress-induced reduction of persistent firing in the parietal cortex.Progress in neurobiology · 2026Article
- High-resolution electrophysiological mapping of effective connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cross-region neuron co-firing mediated by ripple oscillations supports distributed working memory representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Robustness of working memory to prefrontal cortex microstimulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Urinary Incontinence in Men with Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Inter-individual variability (but intra-individual stability) of overt versus covert rehearsal strategies in a digital Corsi task.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- EEG functional connectivity as a Riemannian mediator: An application to malnutrition and cognition.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Excitation/Inhibition balance relates to cognitive function and gene expression in temporal lobe epilepsy: a high density EEG assessment with aperiodic exponent.Brain communications · 2024Article
- 3D synaptic organization of layer III of the human anterior cingulate and temporopolar cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Toward naturalistic neuroscience: Mechanisms underlying the flattening of brain hierarchy in movie-watching compared to rest and task.Science advances · 2023Article
- Secretagogin as a marker to distinguish between different neuron types in human frontal and temporal cortex.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
- Construction of complex memories via parallel distributed cortical-subcortical iterative integration.Trends in neurosciences · 2022Review
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation combined with sound stimulation improves cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ever since it was discovered in the monkey's prefrontal cortex, persistent neuronal activity during the delay period of delay tasks has been considered a phenomenon of working memory. Operationally, this interpretation is correct, because during that delay those tasks require the memorization of a sensory cue, commonly visual. What is incorrect is the assumption that the persistent activity during the delay is caused exclusively by the retention of the sensory cue. In this brief review, the author takes the position that the neural substrate of working memory is an array of long-term memory networks, that is, of cognitive networks (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.