Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115832›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2022

Application of Artificial Intelligence for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Management - A Systematic Review.

Wai Tong Ng, Barton But, Horace C W Choi, Remco de Bree, Anne W M Lee, Victor H F Lee, Fernando López, Antti A Mäkitie, Juan P Rodrigo, Nabil F Saba and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. An introduction to machine learning and generative artificial intelligence for otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons: a narrative review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Wai Tong NgClinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6696-3000
Barton ButDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Horace C W ChoiDepartment of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Remco de BreeDepartment of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anne W M LeeClinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Victor H F LeeClinical Oncology Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Fernando LópezDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias (IUOPA), University of Oviedo, Oviedo, 33011, Spain.
Antti A MäkitieDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, HUS Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-2404
Juan P RodrigoDepartment of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias (IUOPA), University of Oviedo, Oviedo, 33011, Spain.
Nabil F SabaDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4972-1477
Raymond K Y TsangDivision of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-5821
Alfio FerlitoCoordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-8002
University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CNUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKEmory University · USKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is endemic to Eastern and South-Eastern Asia, and, in 2020, 77% of global cases were diagnosed in these regions. Apart from its distinct epidemiology, the natural behavior, treatment, and prognosis are different from other head and neck cancers. With the growing trend of artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning (DL), in head and neck cancer care, we sought to explore the unique clinical application and implementation direction of AI in the management of NPC.

methodsThe search protocol was performed to collect publications using AI, machine learning (ML) and DL in NPC management from PubMed, Scopus and Embase. The articles were filtered using inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality of the papers was assessed. Data were extracted from the finalized articles.

resultsA total of 78 articles were reviewed after removing duplicates and papers that did not meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After quality assessment, 60 papers were included in the current study. There were four main types of applications, which were auto-contouring, diagnosis, prognosis, and miscellaneous applications (especially on radiotherapy planning). The different forms of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) accounted for the majority of DL algorithms used, while the artificial neural network (ANN) was the most frequent ML model implemented.

conclusionThere is an overall positive impact identified from AI implementation in the management of NPC. With improving AI algorithms, we envisage AI will be available as a routine application in a clinical setting soon.

Indexed as

auto contouringdeep learningdiagnosismachine learningneural networkprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35115832
PMCPMC8801370
OpenAlexW4207029416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.