Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115600›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Adapting to the pandemic: longitudinal effects of social restrictions on time perception and boredom during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany.

Marlene Wessels, Nariman Utegaliyev, Christoph Bernhard, Robin Welsch, Daniel Oberfeld, Sven Thönes, Christoph von Castell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictors of changes in marijuana consumption in Germany during the covid-19 pandemic.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Differences in the Temporal Extension of Self-Continuity Over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Self and identity : the journal of the International Society for Self and Identity · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Meaninglessness and monotony in pandemic boredom.Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marlene WesselsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. mwessels@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8720-7837
Nariman UtegaliyevDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3968-6866
Christoph BernhardDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7182-6825
Robin WelschHuman-Centered Ubiquitous Computing, Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7255-7890
Daniel OberfeldDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-3309
Sven ThönesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-5983
Christoph von CastellDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0677-1055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the Covid-19 pandemic, many governments introduced nationwide lockdowns that disrupted people's daily routines and promoted social isolation. We applied a longitudinal online survey to investigate the mid-term effects of the mandated restrictions on the perceived passage of time (PPT) and boredom during and after a strict lockdown in Germany. One week after the beginning of the lockdown in March 2020, respondents reported a slower PPT and increased boredom compared to the pre-pandemic level. However, in the course of the lockdown, PPT accelerated and boredom decreased again until August 2020. Then, in October 2020, when incidence rates sharply rose and new restrictions were introduced, we again observed a slight trend toward a slowing of PPT and an increase of boredom. Our data also show that as the pandemic progressed, respondents adjusted their predictions about the pandemic's duration substantially upward. In sum, our findings suggest that respondents adapted to the pandemic situation and anticipated it as the new "normal". Furthermore, we determined perceived boredom and the general emotional state to be predictive of PPT, while depressive symptoms played a minor role.

Indexed as

BoredomLongitudinal StudiesTime PerceptionAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19FemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleSocial IsolationStress, PsychologicalTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID35115600
PMCPMC8814006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.