Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115559›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Suppression of non-selected solutions as a possible brain mechanism for ambiguity resolution in the word fragment task completion task.

Maxim Kireev, Alexander Korotkov, Ruslan Masharipov, Maya Zheltyakova, Denis Cherednichenko, Valeria Gershkovich, Nadezhda Moroshkina, Natalia Slioussar, Victor Allakhverdov, Tatiana Chernigovskaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maxim KireevInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia. kireev@ihb.spb.ru.
Alexander KorotkovN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Ruslan MasharipovN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Maya ZheltyakovaN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Denis CherednichenkoN. P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Valeria GershkovichInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Nadezhda MoroshkinaInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Natalia SlioussarInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Victor AllakhverdovInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Tatiana ChernigovskayaInstitute for Cognitive Studies, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain systems dealing with multiple meanings of ambiguous stimuli are relatively well studied, while the processing of non-selected meanings is less investigated in the neurophysiological literature and provokes controversy between existing theories. It is debated whether these meanings are actively suppressed and, if yes, whether suppression characterizes any task that involves alternative solutions or only those tasks that emphasize semantic processing or the existence of alternatives. The current functional MRI event-related study used a modified version of the word fragment completion task to reveal brain mechanisms involved in implicit processing of the non-selected solutions of ambiguous fragments. The stimuli were pairs of fragmented adjectives and nouns. Noun fragments could have one or two solutions (resulting in two words with unrelated meanings). Adjective fragments had one solution and created contexts strongly suggesting one solution for ambiguous noun fragments. All fragmented nouns were presented twice during the experiment (with two different adjectives). We revealed that ambiguity resolution was associated with a reduced BOLD signal within several regions related to language processing, including the anterior hippocampi and amygdala and posterior lateral temporal cortex. Obtained findings were interpreted as resulting from brain activity inhibition, which underlies a hypothesized mechanism of suppression of non-selected solutions.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdultAmygdalaBrain MappingComprehensionFemaleHippocampusHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, PhysiologicalReaction TimeTemporal LobeVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID35115559
PMCPMC8814017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.