Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115358›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2022

Delayed puberty in boys in central Sweden: an observational study on diagnosing and management in clinical practice.

Maria Rodanaki, Eva Rask, Maria Lodefalk

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria RodanakiDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden maria.rodanaki@oru.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2641-5629
Eva RaskDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Maria LodefalkDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the usefulness of the classical definition of delayed puberty (DP) in boys with puberty nomograms and to describe the management of DP in boys in a hospital-based setting. STUDY

designObservational retrospective multicentre study with a short-term follow-up. SETTING AND

participantsBoys diagnosed with DP during 2013-2015 at paediatric departments in four counties in central Sweden. The medical records of 165 boys were reviewed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of boys with DP after re-evaluation of the diagnosis according to the classical definition in comparison with puberty nomograms. Description of investigations performed and treatment provided to boys with DP.

resultsIn total, 45 and 58 boys were found to have DP according to the classical definition and the nomograms, respectively. Biochemical and/or radiological testing was performed in 91% of the 58 boys, but an underlying disease was only found in 9% of them. Approximately 79% of the boys received testosterone treatment, either as injections of testosterone enanthate or as testosterone undecanoate.

conclusionsPuberty nomograms may be helpful instruments when diagnosing pubertal disorders in boys as they are not limited to an age close to 14 years and also identify boys with pubertal arrest. The majority of boys with DP undergo biochemical or radiological examinations, but underlying diseases are unusual emphasising the need for structural clinical practice guidelines for this patient group.

Indexed as

Puberty, DelayedChildFemaleHumansMalePubertyRetrospective StudiesSwedenTestosteroneTestosteronecommunity child healthpaediatric endocrinologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35115358
PMCPMC8814808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.