Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115357›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Indirect effects of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on the coverage of essential maternal and newborn health services in a rural subdistrict in Bangladesh: results from a cross-sectional household survey.

Shema Mhajabin, Aniqa Tasnim Hossain, Nowrin Nusrat, Sabrina Jabeen, Shafiqul Ameen, Goutom Banik, Tazeen Tahsina, Anisuddin Ahmed, Qazi Sadeq-Ur Rahman, Emily S Gurley and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shema MhajabinMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-015X
Aniqa Tasnim HossainMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Nowrin NusratMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Sabrina JabeenMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shafiqul AmeenMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Goutom BanikMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Tazeen TahsinaMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anisuddin AhmedMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Qazi Sadeq-Ur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Emily S GurleyJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sanwarul BariMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Atique Iqbal ChowdhuryMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shams El ArifeenMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rajesh MehtaWHO Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Ahmed Ehsanur RahmanMaternal and Child Health Division (MCHD), International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh ehsanur@icddrb.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9216-1079

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper presents the effect of the early phase of COVID-19 on the coverage of essential maternal and newborn health (MNH) services in a rural subdistrict of Bangladesh.

designCross-sectional household survey with random sampling.

settingBaliakandi subdistrict, Rajbari district, Bangladesh.

participantsData were collected from women who were on the third trimester of pregnancy during the early phase of the pandemic (111) and pre-pandemic periods (115) to measure antenatal care (ANC) service coverage. To measure birth, postnatal care (PNC) and essential newborn care (ENC), data were collected from women who had a history of delivery during the early phase of the pandemic (163) and pre-pandemic periods (166). EXPOSURE: Early phase of the pandemic included a strict national lockdown between April and June 2020, and pre-pandemic was defined as August-October 2019. OUTCOME OF INTEREST: Changes in the coverage of selected MNH services (ANC, birth, PNC, ENC) during the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period, estimated by two-sample proportion tests.

findingsAmong women who were on the third trimester of pregnancy during the early phase of the pandemic period, 77% (95% CI: 70% to 85%) received at least one ANC from a medically trained provider (MTP) during the third trimester, compared with 83% (95% CI: 76% to 90%) during the pre-pandemic period (p=0.33). Among women who gave birth during the early phase of the pandemic period, 72% (95% CI: 66% to 79%) were attended by an MTP, compared with 63% (95% CI: 56% to 71%) during the pre-pandemic period (p=0.08). Early initiation of breast feeding was practised among 38% (95% CI: 31% to 46%) of the babies born during the early phase of the pandemic period. It was 37% (95% CI: 29% to 44%) during the pre-pandemic period (p=0.81). The coverage of ANC, birth, PNC and ENC did not differ by months of pandemic and pre-pandemic periods; only the coverage of at least one ANC from an MTP significantly differed among the women who were 7 months pregnant during the early phase of the pandemic (35%, 95% CI: 26% to 44%) and pre-pandemic (49%, 95% CI: 39% to 58%) (p=0.04).

conclusionThe effect of the early phase of the pandemic including lockdown on the selected MNH service coverage was null in the study area. The nature of the lockdown, the availability and accessibility of private sector health services in that area, and the combating strategies at the rural level made it possible for the women to avail the required MNH services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Maternal Health ServicesBangladeshCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancyPrenatal CareSARS-CoV-2COVID-19epidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID35115357
PMCPMC8814430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.