Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115350›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Health research priorities for wildland firefighters: a modified Delphi study with stakeholder interviews.

Chelsea Pelletier, Christopher Ross, Katherine Bailey, Trina M Fyfe, Katie Cornish, Erica Koopmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chelsea PelletierSchool of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada chelsea.pelletier@unbc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-8014
Christopher RossSchool of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Katherine BaileySchool of Health Sciences, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Trina M FyfeNorthern Medical Program, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Katie CornishHealth Research Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Erica KoopmansHealth Research Institute, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe increase in global wildland fire activity has accelerated the urgency to understand health risks associated with wildland fire suppression. The aim of this project was to identify occupational health research priorities for wildland firefighters and related personnel.

designIn order to identify, rank and rate health research priorities, we followed a modified Delphi approach. Data collection involved a two-stage online survey followed by semi-structured interviews.

settingBritish Columbia, Canada.

participantsParticipants included any current or past wildland firefighter or individuals engaged in related roles. There were 132 respondents to the first survey. Responses to the first survey were analysed to produce 10 research topics which were ranked by 75 participants in the second survey (response rate: 84%). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the identification, ranking and level of agreement of research priorities through a two-round online survey. We contextualised these findings through deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews.

resultsThe most important research priorities identified were (% consensus): effects of smoke inhalation on respiratory health (89%), fatigue and sleep (80%), mental health (78%), stress (76%) and long-term risk of disease (67%). Interviews were completed with 14 individuals. Two main themes were developed from an inductive content analysis of interview transcripts: (1) understanding the dynamic risk environment; and (2) organisational fit of mitigation strategies.

conclusionsParticipants expressed a general concern with the unknown mental and physical health impacts of their jobs, including the long-term risk of morbidity and mortality. Future research must address knowledge gaps in our understanding of the health impacts of wildland fire and work to develop appropriate mitigation strategies while considering the needs of workers and unpredictable workplace environment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Open Science Framework, https://osf.io/ugz4s/.

Indexed as

FirefightersWildfiresBritish ColumbiaDelphi TechniqueHumansResearchoccupational & industrial medicineprotocols & guidelinesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35115350
PMCPMC8814744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.