Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115308›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Percutaneous CT-Guided Microwave Ablation Combined with Vertebral Augmentation for Treatment of Painful Spinal Metastases.

L Chen, G Hou, K Zhang, Z Li, S Yang, Y Qiu, Q Yuan, D Hou, X Ye

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The safety and efficacy of combined microwave ablation and percutaneous vertebral augmentation for spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence in the last 6 years.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

L ChenFrom the Departments of Oncology (L.C., K.Z., S.Y., Y.Q., Q.Y.).ORCID 0000-0002-2204-1511
G HouCardiology (G.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-1395-2348
K ZhangFrom the Departments of Oncology (L.C., K.Z., S.Y., Y.Q., Q.Y.) kaixianzhangtz@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8826-3686
Z LiOrthopedics (Z.L.), Tengzhou Central People's Hospital Affiliated with Jining Medical University, Tengzhou, Shandong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3236-5253
S YangFrom the Departments of Oncology (L.C., K.Z., S.Y., Y.Q., Q.Y.).ORCID 0000-0002-9001-630X
Y QiuFrom the Departments of Oncology (L.C., K.Z., S.Y., Y.Q., Q.Y.).ORCID 0000-0002-8540-2679
Q YuanFrom the Departments of Oncology (L.C., K.Z., S.Y., Y.Q., Q.Y.).ORCID 0000-0003-3518-9627
D HouDepartment of Radiation Oncology (D.H.), Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated with Capital Medical University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2129-4805
X YeDepartment of Minimally invasive Oncology (X.Y.), Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-7444
Yangon University of Economics · MMBeijing Shijitan Hospital · CNG. H. Gillespie Associates (United States) · USShandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNTengzhou Central People's Hospital · CNYahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePercutaneous thermal ablation followed by vertebral augmentation is an emerging minimally invasive therapeutic alternative for the management of spinal metastases. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation for the treatment of painful vertebral metastases. MATERIALS AND

methodsOverall, 91 patients with 140 metastatic vertebrae who experienced refractory moderate-to-severe pain were treated with CT-guided microwave ablation and vertebral augmentation. Procedural effectiveness was determined using the visual analog scale, daily morphine consumption, and the Oswestry Disability Index preprocedurally and during follow-up. Local tumor control was assessed at follow-up imaging.

resultsThe procedure was technically successful in all patients. The median visual analog scale score and mean morphine dose were 6 (range, 4-10) and 77.8 (SD, 31.5) mg (range, 15-143 mg), preprocedurally; 5 (range 3-8) and 34.5 (SD, 23.8) mg (range, 0-88 mg) at 3 days; 4 (range, 2-7) and 28.7 (SD, 16.4) mg (range, 0-73 mg) at 1 week; 3 (range, 1-6) and 24.6 (SD, 13.2) mg (range, 0-70 mg) at 1 month; 3 (range, 1-6) and 21.70 (SD, 10.0) mg (range, 0-42 mg) at 3 months; and 3 (range, 1-8) and 21.0 (SD, 9.9) mg (range, 0-46 mg) at 6 months postprocedurally (all

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that percutaneous CT-guided microwave ablation combined with vertebral augmentation is a safe and effective minimally invasive intervention for the treatment of painful spinal metastases.

Indexed as

Spinal FracturesSpinal NeoplasmsBone CementsHumansMicrowavesMorphine DerivativesPainRetrospective StudiesSpineTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeBone CementsMorphine Derivatives

Identifiers

PMID35115308
PMCPMC8910789
OpenAlexW4210566175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.