ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2024
External Validity of Calibrated Measurements from a Laser-Projection Transnasal Fiberoptic High-Speed Videoendoscopy System.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vocal Fold Dissipated Power in Females with Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEvidence-based practice and precision medicine can significantly benefit from the ability to perform calibrated spatial measurements (eg, mm) from endoscopic images. However, calibrated measurements are not readily available from laryngeal images. Laser-projection endoscopes can provide the required information for performing calibrated spatial measurements, but their applications require a process known as calibration. During calibration, a set of benchtop recordings are used to determine the effect of confounding factors of spatial measurements, and also to learn their proper compensation strategies. Calibration benchtop recordings are acquired from flat surfaces and at a perpendicular imaging angle which is significantly different from in-vivo situations, where a three-dimensional (3D) surface gets recorded at a semi-unknown imaging angle. The aim of this study was to quantify changes in calibrated vertical and horizontal measurement accuracies as we move from the controlled condition of calibration to more realistic and uncontrolled settings.
methodA flat surface was positioned in front of a calibrated laser-projection transnasal fiberoptic endoscope at different working distances and imaging angles. Calibrated vertical and horizontal measurement errors were computed from each condition. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to quantify the dependence of vertical and horizontal measurement errors on the imaging angle and working distance. Next, a 3D-printed surface was positioned in front of the laser-projection endoscope at different working distances. Calibrated vertical and horizontal measurement errors were computed from each condition and then they were compared to measurement errors from a flat surface positioned at comparable working distances.
resultsThe outcome of analyses supported a significant effect of imaging angle on calibrated vertical measurement accuracy, while no significant effect of imaging angle on calibrated horizontal measurement accuracy was established. Additionally, the result of multiple linear regression analyses showed that the coefficient of imaging angle was two times larger than the working distance, which further highlights the significant effect of imaging angle on vertical measurement accuracy. Comparing the magnitude of calibrated vertical and horizontal measurement errors between the 3D surface and a flat surface suggested a significant effect of surface topology on calibrated measurement accuracies.
conclusionsThe mean percent magnitude of error of vertical and horizontal measurement errors from the 3D surface were respectively around 6% and 11%, at most working distances, which are acceptable for many applications. However, the significant effect of imaging angle and surface topology on measurement errors highlights the need for further research on these confounding factors. It also suggests that significant improvements in measurement accuracies may be achieved if these factors are properly accounted for during the calibration process. Last but not least, this study highlights the need for the evaluation of laser-projection endoscopes in uncontrolled and more realistic settings. Specifically, evaluations of laser-projection endoscopes in very controlled settings could significantly overestimate their accuracies and hence it will not represent their actual performances during in-vivo data acquisitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.