Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115070›Full record

ArticleParasitology2022

Molecular detection of

Elizabeth Riana, Apinya Arnuphapprasert, Duriyang Narapakdeesakul, Thongchai Ngamprasertwong, Monsicha Wangthongchaicharoen, Pipat Soisook, Phanaschakorn Bhodhibundit, Morakot Kaewthamasorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Complete mitochondrial genome characterization of the haemosporidian parasiteCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular survey ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth RianaVeterinary Parasitology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apinya ArnuphapprasertVeterinary Parasitology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Duriyang NarapakdeesakulVeterinary Parasitology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thongchai NgamprasertwongDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Monsicha WangthongchaicharoenDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pipat SoisookPrincess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Natural History Museum, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Phanaschakorn BhodhibunditSai Yok National Park, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Kanchanaburi, Thailand.
Morakot KaewthamasornVeterinary Parasitology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3072-8708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of trypanosome species is vector-borne parasites, with some of them being medically and veterinary important (such as Trypanosoma cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei) and capable of causing serious illness in vertebrate hosts. The discovery of trypanosomes in bats emphasizes the importance of bats as an important reservoir. Interestingly, there is a hypothesis that bats are ancestral hosts of T. cruzi. Trypanosome diversity has never been investigated in bats in Thailand, despite being in a biodiversity hot spot. To gain a better understanding of the diversity and evolutionary relationship of trypanosomes, polymerase chain reaction-based surveys were carried out from 2018 to 2020 in 17 sites. A total of 576 bats were captured, representing 23 species. A total of 38 (6.6%) positive samples was detected in ten bat species. Trypanosoma dionisii and Trypanosoma noyesi were identified from Myotis siligorensis and Megaderma spasma, respectively. The remaining 18S rRNA sequences of trypanosomes were related to other trypanosomes previously reported elsewhere. The sequences in the current study showed nucleotide identity as low as 90.74% compared to those of trypanosomes in the GenBank database, indicating the possibility of new species. All bat trypanosomes identified in the current study fall within the T. cruzi clade. The current study adds to evidence linking T. noyesi to a bat trypanosome and further supports the bat host origin of the T. cruzi clade. To the best of authors' knowledge, this is the first study on bat trypanosomes in Thailand and their phylogenetic relationships with global isolates.

Indexed as

ChiropteraTrypanosomaTrypanosoma cruziTrypanosomatinaAnimalsDNA, ProtozoanPhylogenyThailandDNA, ProtozoanBatThailandTrypanosoma dionisiiTrypanosoma noyesiTrypanosoma sp.

Identifiers

PMID35115070
PMCPMC11010503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.