Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115052›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

The feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychological intervention for adults with long-term health conditions and subthreshold depression delivered via community pharmacies: a mixed methods evaluation-the Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST).

Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Charlotte E W Kitchen, Samantha Gascoyne, Elizabeth Littlewood, Elizabeth Coleman, Della Bailey, Suzanne Crosland, Caroline Pearson, Shehzad Ali, Jay Badenhorst and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Charlotte E W KitchenDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Samantha GascoyneDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. Samantha.gascoyne@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-2776
Elizabeth LittlewoodDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Elizabeth ColemanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Della BaileyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Suzanne CroslandDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Caroline PearsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Shehzad AliDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Jay BadenhorstWhitworth Chemists Ltd, Foxhills Industrial Estate, Scunthorpe, UK.
Clare BambraInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Catherine HewittDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Claire JonesPublic Health Team, Adult & Health Services, Durham County Council, Durham, UK.
Ada KedingDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Dean McMillanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Claire SloanDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Adam ToddInstitute of Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Paul TonerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Cate WhittleseaUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Michelle WatsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Simon GilbodyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
David EkersDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
University of York · GBNewcastle University · GBDurham County Council · GBKeele University · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBTees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults with long-term health conditions (LTCs) are more likely to experience depressive symptoms which can worsen health outcomes and quality of life, and increase healthcare costs. Subthreshold depression may go undetected and/or untreated. The Community Pharmacies Mood Intervention Study (CHEMIST) explored whether community pharmacies represent a suitable setting to offer brief psychological support to people with LTCs and comorbid subthreshold depression.

methodsA feasibility intervention study with a nested mixed methods evaluation was employed. Adults with subthreshold depression and a minimum of one LTC were recruited from community pharmacies/local general practices and offered a brief psychological support intervention ('Enhanced Support Intervention' (ESI)), based on behavioural activation within a Collaborative Care framework. The intervention included up to six sessions supported by pharmacy staff ('ESI facilitators') trained to deliver the ESI within the community pharmacy setting. Recruitment, retention rates and engagement with the ESI were assessed. Semi-structured, one-to-one interviews with pharmacy staff and study participants, and a focus group with pharmacy staff, explored experiences and acceptability of the study and the ESI. Themes were mapped onto constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

resultsRecruitment of ESI participants was challenging and slower than anticipated despite the varied methods of recruitment employed; although, this was useful in identifying barriers and enabling factors for participation. Engagament with the ESI was good with n=17 (71%) recruited participants commencing the ESI. The ESI was found to be acceptable to participants and ESI facilitators. Retention rate at 4 months was good n=20 (87.0%). The main barriers to identifying potential participants for pharmacy staff were lack of time, resources and limited experience in research. The ESI training and support manual were acceptable to ESI facilitators. The ESI and supporting patient workbook were acceptable to people with LTCs and subthreshold depression.

conclusionsCommunity pharmacies were viewed as an acceptable setting in which to deliver preventative brief psychological support to people with LTCs at risk of depression. This feasibility study provided important data to inform the design of a pilot randomised controlled trial in this setting and highlighted important considerations for future pharmacy-based research.

trial registrationISRCTN11290592.

Indexed as

Behavioural activationCommunity pharmaciesFeasibility studyLong-term conditionsMental wellbeingMixed methodsMulti-morbidityPsychological interventionPublic healthSubthreshold depression

Identifiers

PMID35115052
PMCPMC8812235
OpenAlexW4210444624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.