Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115013›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Adolescent valuation of CARIES-QC-U: a child-centred preference-based measure of dental caries.

H J Rogers, J Sagabiel, Z Marshman, H D Rodd, D Rowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Economic evaluation on dental caries preventive interventions for Australian children using a priority-setting approach.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  8. Comparison of the early childhood oral health impact scale (ECOHIS-4D) and EuroQol-5D-Y for measuring oral health-related quality of life utility in children.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Valuing the Dental Caries Utility Index in Australia.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H J RogersSchool of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. helen.rogers@newcastle.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5031-5009
J SagabielDepartment of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Economics, Uppsala, Sweden.
Z MarshmanUnit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
H D RoddUnit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
D RowenHealth Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Research Trainees Coordinating Centre DRF-2016-09-094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study develops an adolescent value set for a child-centred dental caries-specific measure of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) based upon CARIES-QC (Caries Impacts and Experiences Questionnaire for Children). This study develops a new approach to valuing child health by eliciting adolescent preferences and anchoring these onto the 1-0 full health-dead QALY (quality adjusted life year) scale using ordinal adult preferences.

methodsTwo online surveys were created to elicit preferences for the CARIES-QC classification system. The first comprised best-worst scaling (BWS) tasks for completion by adolescents aged 11-16 years. The second comprised discrete choice experiment tasks with a duration attribute (DCE

results723 adolescents completed the BWS survey and 626 adults completed the DCE

conclusionThis is the first measure with predetermined scoring based on preferences to be developed specifically for use in child oral health research, and uses a novel technique to generate a value set using adolescent preferences. The estimates can be used to generate QALYs in economic evaluations of interventions to improve children's oral health.

Indexed as

Dental CariesQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultDental Caries SusceptibilityHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35115013
PMCPMC8812216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.