Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35115000›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Trend and projection of skilled birth attendants and institutional delivery coverage for adolescents in 54 low- and middle-income countries, 2000-2030.

Md Mizanur Rahman, Hiroko Taniguchi, Raïssa Shiyghan Nsashiyi, Rashedul Islam, Syed Riaz Mahmud, Shafiur Rahman, Jenny Jung, Shahjahan Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Institutional Delivery in the Philippines: Does a Minimum of 8 Antenatal Care Visits Matter?Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Md Mizanur RahmanHitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, University of Hitotsubashi, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan. mizanurrub78@gmail.com.
Hiroko TaniguchiDepartment of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Raïssa Shiyghan NsashiyiDepartment of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Rashedul IslamDepartment of Global Health Policy, School of International Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Syed Riaz MahmudGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shafiur RahmanHamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Jenny JungGlobal Public Health Research Foundation, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shahjahan KhanSchool of Sciences, Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Child Health Research Foundation · BDThe University of Tokyo · JPHamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPHitotsubashi University · JPInstitut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement · CMUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimitations to accessing delivery care services increase the risks of adverse outcomes during pregnancy and delivery for all pregnant women, particularly among adolescents in LMICs. In order to inform adolescent-specific delivery care initiatives and coverage, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of trends, projections and inequalities in coverage of delivery care services among adolescents at national, urban-rural and socio-economic levels in LMICs.

methodsUsing 224 nationally representative cross-sectional survey data between 2000 and 2019, we estimated the coverage of institutional delivery (INSD) and skilled birth attendants (SBA). Bayesian hierarchical regression models were used to estimate trends, projections and determinants of INSD and SBA.

resultsCoverage of delivery care services among adolescents increased substantially at the national level, as well as in both urban and rural areas in most countries between 2000 and 2018. Of the 54 LMICs, 24 countries reached 80% coverage of both INSD and SBA in 2018, and predictions for 40 countries are set to exceed 80% by 2030. The trends in coverage of INSD and SBA of adult mothers mostly align with those for adolescent mothers. Our findings show that urban-rural and wealth-based inequalities to delivery care remain persistent by 2030. In 2018, urban settings across 54 countries had higher rates of coverage exceeding 80% compared to rural for both INSD (45 urban, 16 rural) and SBA (50 urban, 19 rural). Several factors such as household head age ≥ 46 years, household head being female, access to mass media, lower parity, higher education, higher ANC visits and higher socio-economic status could increase the coverage of INSD and SBA among adolescents and adult women.

conclusionsMore than three-quarters of the LMICs are predicted to achieve 80% coverage of INSD and SBA among adolescent mothers in 2030, although with sustained inequalities.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMidwiferyAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyPrenatal CareSocioeconomic FactorsAdolescentBayesian modelDelivery careInequalitiesInstitutional deliveryPredictionSkill birth attendants

Identifiers

PMID35115000
PMCPMC8813474
OpenAlexW4210560272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.