ArticleMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy2022
The Evaluation of Preoperative
Article in Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potential of Lean Body MassMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2026Article
- A radiogenomics study onBMC cancer · 2025Article
- Optimizing Final Pathology Determination in Endometrial Cancer: The Role of PET/CT, MRI, and Biopsy in Serous, Mixed Cell, Clear Cell, and Grade 3 Endometrioid Subtypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of metabolic uptake in gynecological organs using FDG-PET in women diagnosed with nongynecological malignancies.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Application of PET/MRI in Gynecologic Malignancies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Association of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial cancer withAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Management of Gynecological Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEndometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy. The
methodsPreoperative PET/CT data of 66 patients with EC were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into low and high-risk groups according to the European Society for Medical Oncology criteria. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsThe SUV
conclusionSUV and volumetric parameters obtained from PET/CT, especially TLG, are strong predictors of tumor characteristics, such as MI and CSI, FIGO stages, and LNM, and are useful in noninvasively defining the risk groups in the preoperative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.