Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35114576›Full record

ArticleRespiratory medicine2022

Can FeNO be a biomarker in the post-COVID-19 patients monitoring?

Mauro Maniscalco, Pasquale Ambrosino, Remo Poto, Salvatore Fuschillo, Sergio Poto, Maria Gabriella Matera, Mario Cazzola

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mauro ManiscalcoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Pasquale AmbrosinoIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Remo PotoDivision of Pneumology, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona", Salerno, Italy.
Salvatore FuschilloIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Sergio PotoDivision of Pneumology, Department of Medical Sciences, University Hospital "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona", Salerno, Italy.
Maria Gabriella MateraUnit of Pharmacology, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mario CazzolaUnit of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy. Electronic address: mario.cazzola@uniroma2.it.
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITOspedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of the inflammatory and fibrotic processes found in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome makes it possible to speculate that in such patients fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) may be a useful biomarker. Consequently, we set out to verify the consistency of this hypothesis. We consecutively enrolled 68 post-COVID patients after being hospitalized for persistent clinical manifestations within 2 months from disease onset and 29 healthy volunteers as control group. None of post-COVID patients had bronchial asthma or were being treated with a corticosteroid. Only 19 out of 68 post-COVID-19 patients reported a FeNO value > 25 ppb. The mean FeNO value in post-COVID-19 patients was 18.55 ppb (95% CI: 15.50 to 21.58), while in healthy subjects it was 17.46 ppb (95% CI: 15.75 to 19.17). The mean difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). However, the mean FeNO value of post-COVID-19 patients was higher in men than in women (20.97 ppb; 95% CI: 16.61 to 25.33 vs 14.36 ppb; 95% CI: 11.11 to 17.61) with a difference between the two sexes that was statistically significant (P = 0.016). Mean FeNO was 14.89 ppb (95% CI: 10.90 to 18.89) in patients who had been treated with systemic corticosteroids because of their COVID-19, and 20.80 ppb (95% CI: 16.56 to 25.04) in those who had not taken them, with a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.043). The data generated in this study suggest that measurement of FeNO is not useful as a biomarker in post-COVID-19 patient. However, this hypothesis needs solid validation with additional specifically designed studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19BiomarkersBreath TestsExhalationFemaleHumansMaleNitric OxidePost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2BiomarkersNitric OxidebiomarkerFeNOPost-COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID35114576
PMCPMC8789557
OpenAlexW4210279177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.