Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35114179›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2022

External Validation of a Laboratory Prediction Algorithm for the Reduction of Unnecessary Labs in the Critical Care Setting.

Linda T Li, Tongtong Huang, Elmer V Bernstam, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda T LiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery; McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Electronic address: Linda.T.Li@uth.tmc.edu.
Tongtong HuangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Elmer V BernstamSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Harnessing the power of CTSA-CDRN data networks: Using social determinants of health, frailty and functional status to identify at-risk patients and improve risk adjustmentU01TR002393 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI SHIREMAN, PAULA K · 2018 to 2021
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002393NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnnecessary laboratory tests contribute to iatrogenic harm and are a major source of waste in the health care system. We previously developed a machine learning algorithm to help clinicians identify unnecessary laboratory tests, but it has not been externally validated. In this study, we externally validate our machine learning algorithm.

methodsTo externally validate the machine learning algorithm that was originally trained on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database, we tested the algorithm in a separate institution. We identified and abstracted data for all patients older than 18 years admitted to the intensive care unit at Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston, Texas (MHH) from January 1, 2020 to November 13, 2020. Using the transfer learning style, we performed external validation of the machine learning algorithm.

resultsA total of 651 MHH patients were included. The model performed well in predicting abnormality (area under the curve [AUC] 0.98 for MIMIC III and 0.89 for MHH). The model performed similarly in predicting transitions from normal laboratory range to abnormal (AUC 0.71 for MIMIC III and 0.70 for MHH). The performance of the model in predicting the actual laboratory value was also similar in the MIMIC III (accuracy 0.41) and MHH data (0.45).

conclusionsWe externally validated the machine learning model and showed that the model performed similarly, supporting the generalizability to other settings. While this model demonstrated good performance for predicting abnormal labs and transitions, it does not perform well enough for prediction of laboratory values in most clinical applications.

Indexed as

Critical CareMachine LearningAlgorithmsArea Under CurveHumansIntensive Care UnitsCritical care patientsExternal validationLaboratory predictionMachine learningPredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID35114179
PMCPMC11543189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.