Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35114097›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Population temporal structure supplements the rate code during sensorimotor transformations.

Uday K Jagadisan, Neeraj J Gandhi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Similar Response Dynamics Represent Opposite Behaviors and Rewards in the Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distinct context- and content-dependent population codes in superior colliculus during sensation and action.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Sensory tuning in neuronal movement commands.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Instantaneous Midbrain Control of Saccade Velocity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uday K JagadisanDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: kj.udayakiran@gmail.com.
Neeraj J GandhiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA; Center for Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: neg8@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Neural Control of Interceptive MovementsR01EY022854 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GANDHI, NEERAJ J · 2013 to 2021
$3.0M
Population Dynamics in the Oculomotor SystemR01EY024831 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GANDHI, NEERAJ J · 2015 to 2023
$3.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022854NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensorimotor transformations are mediated by premotor brain networks where individual neurons represent sensory, cognitive, and movement-related information. Such multiplexing poses a conundrum-how does a decoder know precisely when to initiate a movement if its inputs are active at times when a movement is not desired (e.g., in response to sensory stimulation)? Here, we propose a novel hypothesis: movement is triggered not only by an increase in firing rate but, critically, also by a reliable temporal pattern in the population response. Laminar recordings in the macaque superior colliculus (SC), a midbrain hub of orienting control, and pseudo-population analyses in SC and cortical frontal eye fields (FEFs) corroborated this hypothesis. Specifically, using a measure that captures the fidelity of the population code-here called temporal stability-we show that the temporal structure fluctuates during the visual response but becomes increasingly stable during the movement command. Importantly, we used spatiotemporally patterned microstimulation to causally test the contribution of population temporal stability in gating movement initiation and found that stable stimulation patterns were more likely to evoke a movement. Finally, a spiking neuron model was able to discriminate between stable and unstable input patterns, providing a putative biophysical mechanism for decoding temporal structure. These findings offer new insights into the long-standing debate on motor preparation and generation by situating the movement gating signal in temporal features of activity in shared neural substrates, and they highlight the importance of short-term population history in neuronal communication and behavior.

Indexed as

NeuronsSuperior ColliculiSaccadesdendritic integrationfrontal eye fieldslinear decodingmotor controlpatterned microstimulationpopulation activitysaccade initiationsuperior colliculustemporal codethreshold

Identifiers

PMID35114097
PMCPMC8930729
OpenAlexW4220797034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.