Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35114014›Full record

ReviewAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2022

Aquaporin-5 in breast cancer.

Malte Bystrup, Frédéric H Login, Sarannya Edamana, Signe Borgquist, Trine Tramm, Tae-Hwan Kwon, Lene N Nejsum

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Aquaporin-5 in breast cancer.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Malte BystrupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Frédéric H LoginDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Sarannya EdamanaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Signe BorgquistDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Trine TrammDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Tae-Hwan KwonDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Taegu, Korea.
Lene N NejsumDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The water channel aquaporin-5 (AQP5) is essential in transepithelial water transport in secretory glands. AQP5 is ectopically overexpressed in breast cancer, where expression is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis. Besides the role in water transport, AQP5 has been found to play a role in cancer metastasis, migration, and proliferation. AQP5 has also been shown to be involved in the dysregulation of epithelial cell-cell adhesion; frequently observed in cancers. Insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of how AQP5 contributes to cancer development and progression is essential for potentially implementing AQP5 as a prognostic biomarker and to develop targeted intervention strategies for the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 5Breast NeoplasmsCell AdhesionFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisWaterAquaporin 5Wateraquaporin-5biomarkerbreast cancercarcinomamigrationproliferation

Identifiers

PMID35114014
PMCPMC9314690
OpenAlexW4210678773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.