Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113972›Full record

ReviewPloS one2022

Prevalence of biofilms in Candida spp. bloodstream infections: A meta-analysis.

María Belén Atiencia-Carrera, Fausto Sebastián Cabezas-Mera, Eduardo Tejera, António Machado

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Neonatal Candida infections in Brazil: study on virulence and antifungal susceptibility with predominance of non-albicans Candida.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Insights ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. StudyingPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Pilocarpine inhibitsMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María Belén Atiencia-CarreraInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Campus Cumbayá, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0001-5232-7900
Fausto Sebastián Cabezas-MeraInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Campus Cumbayá, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-3064-7089
Eduardo TejeraFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropecuarias Aplicadas, Grupo de Bioquimioinformática, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.
António MachadoInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Campus Cumbayá, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-5089-8723
Universidad San Francisco de Quito · ECUniversidad de Las Américas · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCandida-related infections are nowadays a serious Public Health Problem emerging multidrug-resistant strains. Candida biofilm also leads bloodstream infections to invasive systemic infections.

objectiveThe present meta-analysis aimed to analyze Candida biofilm rate, type, and antifungal resistance among hospitalized patients between 1995 and 2020. DATA SOURCES: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched for English papers using the following medical subject heading terms (MESH): "invasive candidiasis"; "bloodstream infections"; "biofilm formation"; "biofilm-related infections"; "mortality"; and "prevalence". STUDY SELECTION: The major inclusion criteria included reporting the rate of biofilm formation and the prevalence of biofilm-related to Candida species, including observational studies (more exactly, cohort, retrospective, and case-control studies). Furthermore, data regarding the mortality rate, the geographical location of the study set, and the use of anti-fungal agents in clinical isolates were also extracted from the studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent extraction of articles by 2 authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 31 studies from publicly available databases met our inclusion criteria. The biofilm formation in the data set varied greatly from 16 to 100% in blood samples. Most of the studies belonged to Europe (17/31) and Asia (9/31). Forest plot showed a pooled rate of biofilm formation of 80.0% (CI: 67-90), with high heterogeneity (Q = 2567.45, I2 = 98.83, τ2 = 0.150) in random effects model (p < 0.001). The funnel plot and Egger's linear regression test failed to find publication bias (p = 0.896). The mortality rate in Candida-related bloodstream infections was 37.9% of which 70.0% were from biofilm-associated infections. Furthermore, Candida isolates were also characterized in low, intermediate, or high biofilm formers through their level of biofilm mass (crystal violet staining or XTT assays) after a 24h growth. When comparing between countries, statistical differences were obtained (p = 0.0074), showing the lower and higher biofilm prevalence values in Italy and Spain, respectively. The prevalence of low, intermediate, and high biofilms were 36.2, 18.9, and 35.0% (p < 0.0001), respectively. C. tropicalis was the prevalent species in high biofilm formation (67.5%) showing statistically significant differences when compared to other Candida species, except for C. krusei and C. glabrata. Finally, the rates of antifungal resistance to fluconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin related to biofilm were 70.5, 67.9 and 72.8% (p < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsEarly detection of biofilms and a better characterization of Candida spp. bloodstream infections should be considered, which eventually will help preserve public health resources and ultimately diminish mortality among patients.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCandidaCandidemiaCandidiasisCaspofunginDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleHospitalizationHumansPrevalenceSepsisVoriconazoleCaspofunginFluconazoleVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID35113972
PMCPMC8812928
OpenAlexW4210672436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.