Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113957›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Effects of combined training on metabolic profile, lung function, stress and quality of life in sedentary adults: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

José Pedro Ferreira, Pedro Duarte-Mendes, Ana M Teixeira, Fernanda M Silva

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04868240 (Effects of Concurrent Training on Metabolic Profile, Lung Function, Quality of Life and Stress in Sedentary Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04868240 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Concurrent Training on Metabolic Profile, Lung Function, Quality of Life and Stress in Sedentary Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CoimbraRan2022 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsSedentary Lifestyle, Metabolic Disorders, Concurrent Exercise, Lung Function DecreasedArmsConcurrent training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José Pedro FerreiraResearch Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4427-3276
Pedro Duarte-MendesDepartment of Sports and Well-Being, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-2696
Ana M TeixeiraResearch Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Fernanda M SilvaResearch Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF, UID/PTD/04213/2019), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-0729
University of Coimbra · PTPolytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are considered modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases and all-cause mortality. Adult office-workers spend most of their working day in sedentary behaviors, so they are particularly at high risk of developed chronic diseases (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders like diabetes mellitus, …). It seems important to promote behavioral changes that could prevent or delay metabolic disease development. Evidence supports the use of exercise programs, however, to date there are several knowledge gaps and inconsistencies in the literature regarding the effects of Combined Training (i.e., aerobic plus resistance training) in sedentary healthy adults. This paper outlines an RCT designed to evaluate the effects of a 16-week combined training program on biochemical and immune markers of metabolic disease, lung function, salivary stress hormones and subjective quality of life (primary outcomes), as well as on body composition and physical fitness (secondary outcomes) in sedentary middle-aged office-workers. Furthermore, we aimed to assess the associations between the changes promoted by the exercise program and the different variables studied. METHODS AND

designThis is a single-blinded two-arm RCT with parallel groups. A minimum of healthy 40 office-workers aged 40-64 years will be recruited to engage in a 16-week intervention study. After baseline assessments, participants will be randomized to one of the two groups: (1) combined training group or (2) control group. Baseline assessments will be repeated after 8 weeks of intervention (mid-testing) and upon completion of the intervention (post-testing). DISCUSSION: This RCT involves a multi-disciplinary approach and seems to be a relevant contribution to understanding the potential role of combined training in improving the metabolic profile, lung function, stress, and quality of life in adults. The results can provide important insights for clinical recommendations and for the optimization of strategies to prevent metabolic disorders in adults with sedentary jobs.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT04868240; date of registration April 30, 2021).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSedentary BehaviorAdultExerciseFemaleHand StrengthHumansLungMaleMetabolomeMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthOccupational HealthPhysical FitnessRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance Training

Identifiers

PMID35113957
PMCPMC8812960
OpenAlexW4210744262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.