Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113923›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Using a theory-informed approach to explore patient and staff perspectives on factors that influence clinical trial recruitment for patients with cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices.

Clair Le Boutillier, Claire Snowdon, Vishal Patel, Mark McPhail, Christopher Ward, Ben Carter, Ruhama Uddin, Ane Zamalloa, Vanessa Lawrence

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Clair Le BoutillierInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-0315
Claire SnowdonLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Vishal PatelInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6616-3628
Mark McPhailInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher WardNIHR Clinical Research Network South London, London, United Kingdom.
Ben CarterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ruhama UddinInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ane ZamalloaInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Vanessa LawrenceInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNIHR Research Delivery Network · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe success of pharmacological randomised controlled trials (RCTs) depends on the recruitment of the required number of participants. Recruitment to RCTs for patients with cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices raises specific additional challenges. The objectives of the study were 1) to explore patient perspectives on factors that influence RCT recruitment, 2) to understand factors that influence the success of recruitment from a staff perspective, and 3) to identify opportunities for tailored interventions to improve trial recruitment in this context.

methodsThe qualitative study was embedded in a multi-centre blinded RCT (BOPPP trial) and was conducted alongside site opening. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who enrolled to participate in the trial (n = 13), patients who declined to take part (n = 5), and staff who were responsible for recruiting participants to the trial (n = 18). An open approach to data collection and analysis was adopted and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to provide a theoretical lens through which to view influences on behaviour. Data was analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe findings consist of 5 overarching themes that outline trial recruitment influences at the patient, staff, team, organisational and trial levels: i) patient risks and benefits ii) staff attitudes, knowledge and capacity, iii) team-based approach, iv) organisational context and v) Trial collective. Patient-generated themes map onto thirteen of the fourteen TDF domains and staff-generated themes map onto all TDF domains. The overarching themes are not mutually exclusive; with evidence of direct interactions between patient and staff-level themes that influence recruitment behaviours.

conclusionsThis study uses a theory-informed approach to gain new insights into improving clinical trial recruitment for patients with cirrhosis and small oesophageal varices. Although people with cirrhosis often display decreased healthcare-seeking behaviours, we found that patients used research to empower themselves to improve their health. Pragmatic trials involving unpredictable populations require staff expertise in building trust, and a deep knowledge of the patient group and their vulnerabilities. RCT recruitment is also more successful when research visits align with what staff identified as the natural rhythm of care.

trial registrationISRCTN10324656; https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient SatisfactionPatient SelectionAdultAgedEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResearch DesignResearch PersonnelUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID35113923
PMCPMC8812916
OpenAlexW4210764933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.