Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113922›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Systematic review and meta-analysis of myopia prevalence in African school children.

Godwin Ovenseri-Ogbomo, Uchechukwu L Osuagwu, Bernadine N Ekpenyong, Kingsley Agho, Edgar Ekure, Antor O Ndep, Stephen Ocansey, Khathutshelo Percy Mashige, Kovin Shunmugan Naidoo, Kelechi C Ogbuehi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Regional variations and temporal trends of childhood myopia prevalence in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Epidemiology of Refractive Error in Ghana: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An Evaluation of the Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer and Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Low Myopes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Godwin Ovenseri-OgbomoDepartment of Optometry, Centre for Health Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Uchechukwu L OsuagwuTranslational Health Research Institute (THRI), Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1727-6914
Bernadine N EkpenyongEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.
Kingsley AghoSchool of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.
Edgar EkureSalus University Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Antor O NdepDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3273-8195
Stephen OcanseyDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-0969
Khathutshelo Percy MashigeAfrican Vision Research Institute, Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.
Kovin Shunmugan NaidooAfrican Vision Research Institute, Discipline of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.
Kelechi C OgbuehiDepartment of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Calabar · NGCamden and Campbelltown Hospitals · AUSalus University · USTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Cape Coast · GHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreased prevalence of myopia is a major public health challenge worldwide, including in Africa. While previous studies have shown an increasing prevalence in Africa, there is no collective review of evidence on the magnitude of myopia in African school children. Hence, this study reviews the evidence and provides a meta-analysis of the prevalence of myopia in African school children.

methodsThis review was conducted using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Five computerized bibliographic databases, PUBMED, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and Africa Index Medicus were searched for published studies on the prevalence of myopia in Africa from 1 January 2000 to 18 August 2021. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. Data were gathered by gender, age and refraction technique and standardized to the definition of myopia as refractive error ≥ 0.50 diopter. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence. Significant heterogeneity was detected among the various studies (I2 >50%), hence a random effect model was used, and sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the effects of outliers.

resultsWe included data from 24 quality assessed studies, covering 36,395 African children. The overall crude prevalence of myopia over the last two decades is 4.7% (95% CI, 3.9-5.7) in African children. Although the prevalence of myopia was slightly higher in females (5.3%, 95%CI: 4.1, 6.5) than in males (3.7%, 95% CI, 2.6-4.7; p = 0.297) and higher in older [12-18 years 5.1% (95% CI, 3.8-6.3) than younger children (aged 5-11 years, 3.4%, 95% CI, 2.5-4.4; p = 0.091), the differences were not significant. There was a significantly lower prevalence of myopia with cycloplegic compared with non-cycloplegic refraction [4.2%, 95%CI: 3.3, 5.1 versus 6.4%, 95%CI: 4.4, 8.4; p = 0.046].

conclusionsOur results showed that myopia affects about one in twenty African schoolchildren, and it is overestimated in non-cycloplegic refraction. Clinical interventions to reduce the prevalence of myopia in the region should target females, and school children who are aged 12-18 years.

Indexed as

Refraction, OcularAdolescentAfricaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMyopiaPrevalenceRefractive ErrorsVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID35113922
PMCPMC8812871
OpenAlexW4210791979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.