ArticlePloS one2022
Development of an efficient antimicrobial susceptibility testing method with species identification by Nanopore sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-course analysis of the effect of paraprobiotics ABG0050 on the intestinal immune system of broilers.Poultry science · 2025Article
- 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis of V6-V8 Region Provides Limited Advantage in Diagnosis of Chronic Prostatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA is a common method for studying microbial community, it has been difficult to identify genera and species using next-generation sequencers to examine some regions (e.g., V3-V4 of 16S rRNA) because of the short read lengths. However, the advent of third-generation sequencers has made it possible to analyze the full length of the 16S rRNA gene, which allowed for species level identification at low cost. In this study, we evaluated the accuracy of the identification with a third-generation sequencer, MinION from Oxford Nanopore Technologies, using nine indigenous bacteria that can pose problems with food poisoning and opportunistic infections as an example. We demonstrated that Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus hirae could be identified at the species level with an accuracy of 96.4% to 97.5%. We also demonstrated that the absolute counts of various bacteria could be determined by spiking the sample with a bacterium as an internal standard. Then, we tested whether this convenient bacterial identification method could evaluate the antibiotic sensitivities of multiple bacteria simultaneously. In order to evaluate antimicrobial susceptibility, a mock community, an artificial mixture of the nine bacterial strains, was prepared and cultured in the presence of the antibiotics ofloxacin or chloramphenicol, and the 16S rRNAs were analyzed by using Nanopore sequencer. We confirmed that antibiotic-induced cell count reductions could be measured simultaneously by quantifying the abundances of various bacteria in the mock community before and after culture. It was thus shown that the antibiotic sensitivities of multiple bacteria could be evaluated simultaneously, with distinction made between bactericidal action and bacteriostatic action. This methodology would allow rapid evaluation of antibiotic activity spectrum at the species level containing a wide variety of bacteria, such as biofilm bacteria and gut microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.