Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113875›Full record

SynthesisPLoS biology2022

Meta-analysis reveals an extreme "decline effect" in the impacts of ocean acidification on fish behavior.

Jeff C Clements, Josefin Sundin, Timothy D Clark, Fredrik Jutfelt

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptive Responses of Large Yellow CroakerAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of pH on Olfactory Behaviours in Male Shore Crabs,Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. A framework for untangling the consequences of artificial light at night on species interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeff C ClementsDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5140-5751
Josefin SundinDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-4046
Timothy D ClarkSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8738-3347
Fredrik JutfeltDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-3991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocean acidification-decreasing oceanic pH resulting from the uptake of excess atmospheric CO2-has the potential to affect marine life in the future. Among the possible consequences, a series of studies on coral reef fish suggested that the direct effects of acidification on fish behavior may be extreme and have broad ecological ramifications. Recent studies documenting a lack of effect of experimental ocean acidification on fish behavior, however, call this prediction into question. Indeed, the phenomenon of decreasing effect sizes over time is not uncommon and is typically referred to as the "decline effect." Here, we explore the consistency and robustness of scientific evidence over the past decade regarding direct effects of ocean acidification on fish behavior. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis of 91 studies empirically testing effects of ocean acidification on fish behavior, we provide quantitative evidence that the research to date on this topic is characterized by a decline effect, where large effects in initial studies have all but disappeared in subsequent studies over a decade. The decline effect in this field cannot be explained by 3 likely biological explanations, including increasing proportions of studies examining (1) cold-water species; (2) nonolfactory-associated behaviors; and (3) nonlarval life stages. Furthermore, the vast majority of studies with large effect sizes in this field tend to be characterized by low sample sizes, yet are published in high-impact journals and have a disproportionate influence on the field in terms of citations. We contend that ocean acidification has a negligible direct impact on fish behavior, and we advocate for improved approaches to minimize the potential for a decline effect in future avenues of research.

Indexed as

Hydrogen-Ion ConcentrationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBiasCoral ReefsFishesOceans and SeasSeawater

Identifiers

PMID35113875
PMCPMC8812914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.