ArticlePloS one2022
Empirical estimation of marine phytoplankton assemblages in coastal and offshore areas using an in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EnhancedISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phytoplankton assemblages are essential for understanding the quality of primary production in marine ecosystems. Here, we describe the development of a methodology for monitoring marine phytoplankton assemblages using an in situ multi-wavelength excitation fluorometer (MEX). The MEX recorded the fluorescence excited with nine light-emitting diodes, temperature, and sensor depth. We prepared reference datasets comprising MEX fluorescence and plant pigment-based phytoplankton assemblages of nine chemotaxonomy groups (diatoms, dinoflagellates, cryptophytes, chlorophytes, haptophytes type 3, haptophytes type 4, prasinophytes, cyanophytes, and prochlorophytes). Conversions from the MEX fluorescence to the phytoplankton assemblages were conducted with two processes. First, target MEX fluorescence was decomposed using a linear inverse model for calculating coefficients. Second, pigment-based chemotaxonomy of the target MEX fluorescence was reconstructed using the coefficients and the chemotaxonomy assemblages of the reference data. Cross-validation analyses indicated good estimation of the proportion of diatoms, dinoflagellates, cryptophytes, cyanophytes, and prochlorophytes with MEX, and when chlorophytes, haptophytes and prasinophytes were summarized as other eukaryotes, the positive correlation was seen between proportions estimated with MEX and pigments as same as other five chemotaxonomy groups. Repeated MEX observations were conducted in the Kuroshio, the Sea of Japan, the Oyashio, and the Okhotsk Sea. The water-column integrated biomass indicated that the diatoms were an important primary producer in the Oyashio and the Okhotsk Sea, while eukaryotes were important in the Sea of Japan and prochlorophytes were important in the Kuroshio. Our method with the MEX will be a powerful tool to understand and estimate the chemotaxonomy-level assemblages and biomass in the ocean.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.