Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113733›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2022

Loss to Follow-Up and the Care Cascade for Cervical Cancer Care in Rural Guatemala: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Andrea Garcia, Michel Juarez, Neftali Sacuj, Evelyn Tzurec, Karen Larson, Ann Miller, Peter Rohloff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea GarciaCenter for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.
Michel JuarezCenter for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.ORCID 0000-0003-1990-298X
Neftali SacujCenter for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.ORCID 0000-0001-9838-9293
Evelyn TzurecFriendship Bridge, Panajachel, Sololá, Guatemala.
Karen LarsonFriendship Bridge, Panajachel, Sololá, Guatemala.
Ann MillerDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-9439
Peter RohloffCenter for Indigenous Health Research, Wuqu' Kawoq, Maya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-8315
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMore than 80% of cervical cancer cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Here, we analyze a large geographically extensive cross-sectional data set from the Western rural highlands of Guatemala. Our objective is to better characterize weak points in care along the cervical cancer care continuum and investigate sociodemographic and clinical correlates of loss to follow-up.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records data from July 21, 2015, through December 10, 2020 for a cytology-based screening and cervical cancer treatment program. We used a care cascade analysis to characterize the progression of individuals through screening, confirmatory testing, and treatment. We examined demographic and clinical factors correlated with screening and loss to follow-up using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsA total of 8,872 individuals were included in the analysis. Five thousand nine hundred thirteen cervical cancer screenings were conducted. 4.1% of all screening tests were abnormal, including 0.61% cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or overt cervical cancer. Care cascade analysis showed that 67% of eligible women accepted screening. Of those requiring confirmatory testing or treatment, 73% completed recommended follow-up. In adjusted multivariable analysis, prior history of sexual transmitted infection, prior experience with cervical cancer screening, older age, and current contraceptive use were associated with accepting screening. Age and contraceptive use were also associated with retention in care after a positive first screen.

conclusionIn a large rural Guatemalan retrospective cohort, a care continuum analysis showed that both declining the opportunity to receive cervical cancer screening as well as declining confirmatory testing after a first positive screen were both important weak points along the care continuum. These data support the need for comprehensive and culturally appropriate initiatives to improve screening uptake and retention in care.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGuatemalaHumansRetrospective StudiesContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID35113733
PMCPMC8853617
OpenAlexW4210384445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.