ArticleJCO global oncology2022
Loss to Follow-Up and the Care Cascade for Cervical Cancer Care in Rural Guatemala: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) and Atypical Squamous Cells-Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H) in a Low-Income Clinical Setting: A Retrospective Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2026Article
- Demographic and Screening-to-Diagnosis Cascade Indicators for Risk Stratification in an Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program: Evidence from 82,141 Women in Yunnan, China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Cascade: A Framework for Monitoring Uptake and Retention Along the Screening and Treatment Pathway.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Impact of telephone reminders on posttreatment follow-up among women treated for cervical precancers in Cameroon: A randomized controlled trial.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Article
- Cascade of care for people with positive symptoms of common cancers in selected primary health centres of Puducherry: An explanatory mixed-method study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Prevalence of diabetes among Indigenous women in Guatemala: a retrospective chart review.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening via Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid and Lugol Iodine for Triage of HPV-Positive Women.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Prevalence of diabetes among Indigenous women in Guatemala: A retrospective chart review study of 13 643 patients between 2015-2022.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Application of the Cascade of Care Framework to Guide Evidence-Informed Implementation of Anal Cancer Screening Guidelines.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMore than 80% of cervical cancer cases and deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Here, we analyze a large geographically extensive cross-sectional data set from the Western rural highlands of Guatemala. Our objective is to better characterize weak points in care along the cervical cancer care continuum and investigate sociodemographic and clinical correlates of loss to follow-up.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of electronic health records data from July 21, 2015, through December 10, 2020 for a cytology-based screening and cervical cancer treatment program. We used a care cascade analysis to characterize the progression of individuals through screening, confirmatory testing, and treatment. We examined demographic and clinical factors correlated with screening and loss to follow-up using multivariate logistic regression.
resultsA total of 8,872 individuals were included in the analysis. Five thousand nine hundred thirteen cervical cancer screenings were conducted. 4.1% of all screening tests were abnormal, including 0.61% cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or overt cervical cancer. Care cascade analysis showed that 67% of eligible women accepted screening. Of those requiring confirmatory testing or treatment, 73% completed recommended follow-up. In adjusted multivariable analysis, prior history of sexual transmitted infection, prior experience with cervical cancer screening, older age, and current contraceptive use were associated with accepting screening. Age and contraceptive use were also associated with retention in care after a positive first screen.
conclusionIn a large rural Guatemalan retrospective cohort, a care continuum analysis showed that both declining the opportunity to receive cervical cancer screening as well as declining confirmatory testing after a first positive screen were both important weak points along the care continuum. These data support the need for comprehensive and culturally appropriate initiatives to improve screening uptake and retention in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.