ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2022
Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pupil- and gaze dynamics track emotion content in naturalistic speech.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Adding volition to word processing: Expected utility norms for 80,000 English words and multiword expressions.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- An ERP Study of Modality-Specific Effects on Emotional Word Processing.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Thickness Is More Than Affective Valence: Evaluative Language Through the Lenses of Psycholinguistics.Cognitive science · 2026Article
- The effects of vocal emotions and emotional context on the neural tracking of speech envelopes and listeners' vigilance states.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Ratings of valence, arousal, happiness, anger, fear, sadness, disgust, and surprise for 24,000 Dutch words.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- A psycholinguistic study of intergroup bias and its cultural propagation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The interference of negative emotional stimuli on semantic vigilance performance in a dual-task setting.Biologia futura · 2024Article
- Measuring semantic memory using associative and dissociative retrieval tasks.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- The effect of auditory valence on subsequent visual semantic processing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recognizing written or spoken words involves a sequence of processing stages, transforming sensory features into lexical-semantic representations. Whereas the later processing stages are common across modalities, the initial stages are modality-specific. In the visual modality, previous studies have shown that words with positive valence are recognized faster than neutral words. Here, we examined whether the effects of valence on word recognition are specific to the visual modality or are common across visual and auditory modalities. To address this question, we analyzed multiple large databases of visual and auditory lexical decision tasks, relating the valence of words to lexical decision times while controlling for a large number of variables, including arousal and frequency. We found that valence differentially influenced visual and auditory word recognition. Valence had an asymmetric effect on visual lexical decision times, primarily speeding up recognition of positive words. By contrast, valence had a symmetric effect on auditory lexical decision times, with both negative and positive words speeding up word recognition relative to neutral words. The modality-specificity of valence effects were consistent across databases and were observed when the same sets of words were compared across modalities. We interpret these findings as indicating that valence influences word recognition partly at the sensory-perceptual stage. We relate these effects to the effects of positive (reward) and negative (punishment) reinforcers on perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.