Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113469›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2022

Use of Riparian Spiders as Sentinels of Persistent and Bioavailable Chemical Contaminants in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Review.

Matthew M Chumchal, Gale B Beaubien, Ray W Drenner, Madeline P Hannappel, Marc A Mills, Connor I Olson, Ryan R Otter, Andrew C Todd, David M Walters

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ecosystem services provided by spiders.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew M ChumchalBiology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7160-3157
Gale B BeaubienOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-8917-8726
Ray W DrennerBiology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Madeline P HannappelDepartment of Biology, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-0098
Marc A MillsOffice of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Solutions and Emergency Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Connor I OlsonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Ryan R OtterDepartment of Biology, Molecular Bioscience, Data Science Institute, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Andrew C ToddBiology Department, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
David M WaltersUS Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-4237-2158
Texas Christian University · USOhio Environmental Protection Agency · USMiddle Tennessee State University · USSyracuse University · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of North Texas · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquatic ecosystems around the world are contaminated with a wide range of anthropogenic chemicals, including metals and organic pollutants, that originate from point and nonpoint sources. Many of these chemical contaminants have complex environmental cycles, are persistent and bioavailable, can be incorporated into aquatic food webs, and pose a threat to the health of wildlife and humans. Identifying appropriate sentinels that reflect bioavailability is critical to assessing and managing aquatic ecosystems impacted by contaminants. The objective of the present study is to review research on riparian spiders as sentinels of persistent and bioavailable chemical contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Our review of the literature on riparian spiders as sentinels suggests that significant progress has been made during the last two decades of research. We identified 55 published studies conducted around the world in which riparian spiders (primarily of the families Tetragnathidae, Araneidae, Lycosidae, and Pisauridae) were used as sentinels of chemical contamination of lotic, lentic, and estuarine systems. For several contaminants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Hg, and Se, it is now clear that riparian spiders are appropriate sentinels. However, many contaminants and factors that could impact chemical concentrations in riparian spiders have not been well characterized. Further study of riparian spiders and their potential role as sentinels is critical because it would allow for development of national-scale programs that utilize riparian spiders as sentinels to monitor chemical contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. A riparian spider sentinel program in the United States would be complementary to existing national sentinel programs, including those for fish and immature dragonflies. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:499-514. © 2021 SETAC.

Indexed as

OdonataPolychlorinated BiphenylsSpidersWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsEcosystemFood ChainHumansPolychlorinated BiphenylsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAquatic contaminantsAquatic-terrestrial contaminant fluxRiparian spidersSentinels

Identifiers

PMID35113469
PMCPMC9703374
OpenAlexW4210417484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.