Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113463›Full record

ArticleClinical oral implants research2022

Reliability and accuracy of dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement.

Yiqun Wu, Baoxin Tao, Kengliang Lan, Yihan Shen, Wei Huang, Feng Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155799 (Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06155799 naunknown statusnot on this map

Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System on Zygomatic Implant Placement: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2022 to 2024Enrolled8ConditionsDental Implants, Surgery, Computer-AssistedArmsFreehand zygomatic implant placement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yiqun WuDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8352-6256
Baoxin TaoDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-5470
Kengliang LanDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yihan ShenDepartment of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei HuangCollege of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Feng WangCollege of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2019-I2M-5-037Clinical ResearchPlan of SHDC SHDC2020CR3049B"Multidisciplinary Team" Clinical Research Project of Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine 2017-1-005Research Discipline fund from Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, and College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University KQYJXK2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the accuracy of a real-time dynamic navigation system applied in zygomatic implant (ZI) surgery and summarize device-related negative events and their management. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients who presented with severely maxillary atrophy or maxillary defects and received dynamic navigation-supported ZI surgery were included. The deviations of entry, exit, and angle were measured after image data fusion. A linear mixed-effects model was used. Statistical significance was defined as p < .05. Device-related negative events and their management were also recorded and analyzed.

resultsTwo hundred and thirty-one zygomatic implants (ZIs) with navigation-guided placement were planned in 74 consecutive patients between Jan 2015 and Aug 2020. Among them, 71 patients with 221 ZIs received navigation-guided surgery finally. The deviations in entry, exit, and angle were 1.57 ± 0.71 mm, 2.1 ± 0.94 mm and 2.68 ± 1.25 degrees, respectively. Significant differences were found in entry and exit deviation according to the number of ZIs in the zygomata (p = .03 and .00, respectively). Patients with atrophic maxillary or maxillary defects showed a significant difference in exit deviation (p = .01). A total of 28 device-related negative events occurred, and one resulted in 2 ZI failures due to implant malposition. The overall survival rate of ZIs was 98.64%, and the mean follow-up time was 24.11 months (Standard Deviation [SD]: 12.62).

conclusionsThe navigation-supported ZI implantation is an accurate and reliable surgical approach. However, relevant technical negative events in the navigation process are worthy of attention.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsJaw, EdentulousDental Implantation, EndosseousDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedHumansMaxillaReproducibility of ResultsZygomaDental Implantsdental implantsdental prosthesisjaw, edentuloussurgery, computer-assistedzygoma

Identifiers

PMID35113463
PMCPMC9305866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.