ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2022
The Role of Patch Testing in Evaluating Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Medications.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nivolumab Hypersensitivity Reactions a Myth or Reality in Solid Tumors-A Systematic Review of the Literature.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Pooled it
- Patch Testing in Paediatric Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications.Contact dermatitis · 2026Review
- Hydroxychloroquine Patch Test Positivity in a Patient With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Contact dermatitis · 2026Article
- Wine-induced fixed drug eruption.JAAD case reports · 2026Article
- A systematic review of the outcomes of desensitization for delayed-type cutaneous adverse reactions induced by antituberculosis drugs.Asia Pacific allergy · 2026Review
- The cutaneous mirror: leveraging drug-induced skin phenotypes as early visual risk signals for systemic toxicity, a comprehensive review.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Review
- Certolizumab-Induced Urticarial Vasculitis: A Case Report.Current drug safety · 2026Article
- Emulgel withPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Attribution of causality in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.The ocular surface · 2025Review
- Lymphocyte Transformation Tests and Patch Tests to Identify Drugs Potentially Associated With Bullous Pemphigoid Development.International journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Towards standardized skin testing for drug-induced allergic reactions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025Review
- Instantaneous self-recovery and ultra-low detection limit hydrogel electronic sensor for temporomandibular disorders intelligent diagnosis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A Case of an Allergic Contact Dermatitis Following the Administration of Enoxaparin: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2025Article
- Piperacillin-Tazobactam-Induced Urticaria and Angioedema: A Case Report With Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Spectrum of offending drugs and cutaneous adverse drug reactions requiring hospitalisation in a tertiary South African hospital in TB/HIV endemic setting.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
- Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: Potential Value of the Lymphocyte Toxicity Assay to Assess Risk.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2023Article
- Case report: Severe non-pigmenting fixed drug eruption showing general symptoms caused by chondroitin sulfate sodium.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- DRESS syndrome: an interaction between drugs, latent viruses, and the immune system.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Confirming drug imputability is an important step in the management of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADR). Re-challenge is inconvenient and in many cases life threatening. We review the literature on ideal patch testing technique for specific CADRs. Testing should be performed approximately 3 months after the resolution of the eruption using standard patch testing techniques. Commercially available patch test preparations are available for a minority of drugs, so in most cases, testing should be performed with the drug at various recommended concentrations and in different vehicles. Testing to all known excipients, such as dyes, vehicles and preservatives is also important. Immunosuppressive medications should be discontinued or down titrated to the lowest tolerable dose to decrease the risk of false negative reactions. We provide an overview of expert recommendations and extant evidence on the utility of patch testing for identifying the culprit drug in common CADRs and for specific drug or drug classes. Overall, there appears to be significant variability in the patch test positivity of different drugs, which is likely the result of factors intrinsic to the drug such as dermal absorption (as a function of lipophilicity and molecular size) and whether the drug itself or a downstream metabolite is implicated in the immune reaction. Drugs with high patch test positivity rates include beta-lactam antibiotics, aromatic anticonvulsants, phenytoin, and corticosteroids, among others. Patch testing positivity varies both as a function of the drug and type of CADR. The sum of the evidence suggests that patch testing in the setting of morbilliform eruptions, fixed drug eruption, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and possibly also drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, photoallergic and eczematous reactions may be worthwhile, although utility of testing may vary on the specific drug in question for the eruption. It appears to be of limited utility and is not recommended in the setting of other complex CADR, such as SJS/TEN and leukocytoclastic vasculitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.