Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113323›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2022

iStent inject Trabecular Micro-Bypass with or Without Cataract Surgery Yields Sustained 5-Year Glaucoma Control.

Fritz H Hengerer, Gerd U Auffarth, Ina Conrad-Hengerer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Comparative One-Year Outcomes of T-HookJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical outcomes of combined cataract surgery with iStent injectGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Position of the ISTENT InjectJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fritz H HengererDepartment of Ophthalmology, Buergerhospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gerd U AuffarthInternational Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), David J Apple International Laboratory of Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ina Conrad-HengererInternational Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), David J Apple International Laboratory of Ophthalmic Pathology, Department of Ophthalmology, University Eye Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. mail@augenarzt-trebur.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study evaluated the 5-year effectiveness and safety of iStent inject

methodsThis prospective longitudinal case series included consecutive iStent inject cases from a single surgeon at a large German academic hospital. Intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, safety, and indicators of disease stability through 5 years were assessed in the Overall cohort and in subgroup analyses stratified by usage (Combined or Standalone).

resultsPreoperative mean IOP in the Overall cohort (n = 125) was 23.5 ± 6.2 mmHg on 2.68 ± 1.02 mean medications, reducing to 14.1 ± 1.8 mmHg on 0.77 ± 0.82 medications at 5 years (40% and 71% reductions, respectively; both p < 0.001). All but 1 eye (> 99%) were on medication(s) preoperatively, but 46% were medication-free at 5 years (p < 0.001). In Combined eyes (n = 81), mean IOP decreased by 39% (22.6 mmHg to 13.8 mmHg, p < 0.001) and medications by 69% (2.52 to 0.78, p < 0.001). In Standalone eyes, mean IOP reduced by 42% (25.3 mmHg to 14.6 mmHg, p < 0.001) and medications by 75% (2.98 to 0.74, p < 0.001). At final follow-up, 83% of eyes had achieved ≥ 20% IOP reduction, and all but 1 eye (> 99%) had the same or lower IOP versus preoperative; all eyes (100%) maintained or reduced their medication burden versus preoperative. Favorable safety included 0 intraoperative complications and 0 filtration surgeries through 5 years. Long-term indicators of disease stability (visual fields, retinal nerve-fiber layer thickness, and cup:disc ratio) were unchanged over the course of 5-year follow-up.

conclusionsiStent inject produced significant and durable 5-year reductions in IOP (nearly 10-mmHg reduction) and medications (nearly 2-medication reduction), with stable disease parameters over time. Combined and Standalone subgroups had similar outcomes.

Indexed as

CataractGlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureProspective StudiesStentsCataractIntraocular pressureiStent injectLong-termMicroinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS)Second-generationStentTrabecular bypass

Identifiers

PMID35113323
PMCPMC8918186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.