Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113259›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2022

Time to onset and duration of botulinum toxin efficacy in movement disorders.

Claudia Ledda, Carlo Alberto Artusi, Antonella Tribolo, Domiziana Rinaldi, Gabriele Imbalzano, Leonardo Lopiano, Maurizio Zibetti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia Ledda *Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Carlo Alberto Artusi *Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy. caartusi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-3772
Antonella TriboloDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Domiziana RinaldiDipartimento di Neuroscienze, Salute Mentale e Organi di Senso, Sapienza Università di Roma, Via di Grottarossa, 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele ImbalzanoDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Leonardo Lopiano *Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Maurizio Zibetti *Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBotulinum toxin (BoNT) is a valuable treatment in movement disorders; however, time to onset and duration of efficacy may widely differ among patients. We aimed to clarify the impact of main demographic and clinical features on time to onset and duration of BoNT efficacy.

methodsWe analyzed time-to-onset and duration of BoNT efficacy in 186 consecutive patients treated with BoNT for blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, facial hemispasm, oromandibular dystonia, limb dystonia, and sialorrhea due to Parkinsonism. The following factors were considered as potential efficacy predictors: doses and types of toxin, sex, age, years of treatment, and clinical condition. Kruskall-Wallis, Spearman correlation, and multivariate linear regression were used for statistical analysis.

resultsThe average time to onset was 6.7 ± 5 days and duration of BONT efficacy 78.5 ± 28.4 days. Both time to onset and duration of efficacy were correlated with BoNT doses (p: 0.007 and p: 0.02). The multiple regression analysis showed that sex, age, years of BoNT treatment, doses, type of toxin, and clinical condition significantly predicted time to onset (F(11, 171) = 2.146, p: 0.020) with age being the strongest predictor (p: 0.004). The same model explained 20.1% of the variance of duration of BoNT efficacy, showing a significant prediction of the outcome (F(11, 164) = 3.754, p < 0.001), with doses (p < 0.001), type of toxin (p: 0.017), and clinical condition (p < 0.001) being the strongest predictors.

conclusionOur findings suggest that age, type of toxin, clinical condition and especially doses may account for the variability of BoNT efficacy in terms of time to onset and duration.

Indexed as

BlepharospasmBotulinum Toxins, Type AMovement DisordersNeuromuscular AgentsSialorrheaTorticollisHumansBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular AgentsBotulinum toxinDurationEfficacyMovement disordersSialorrhea

Identifiers

PMID35113259
PMCPMC9217780
OpenAlexW4210645541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.