Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113250›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022

Recharacterization of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis via a subdividing grading method in 236 Chinese patients.

Chao Cheng, Minyi Zhu, Tianlan Lin, Ziyan Chen, Weiting Zeng, Kunke Li, Ran Xue, Fang Duan, Kaili Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chao Cheng *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Minyi Zhu *Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Tianlan LinZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ziyan ChenZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Weiting ZengZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Kunke LiZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ran XueZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Fang DuanZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Kaili WuZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. wukaili@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-683X
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSuperior limbic keratoconjunctivitis (SLK) is an uncommon and often overlooked chronic ocular surface disease. This retrospective consecutive case series study on Chinese patients aimed to characterize the features of this disease, including those undescribed in previous literature.

methodsTwo hundred thirty-six patients diagnosed with SLK were enrolled into this consecutive case study from 2016 to 2019. The demographics, symptoms, Ocular Surface Disease Index, and ocular signs were collected and analyzed. A scoring system (SLK scale index, SSI) that integrated five major sign scores was applied to evaluate SLK severity.

resultsOf the 236 SLK patients, dryness was the most common complaint (59.3%). Of 459 SLK eyes, superior limbus/conjunctival staining (SCS) was present in 98% eyes, followed by the superior tarsal conjunctival alterations (85.2%) and superior bulbar conjunctiva hyperemia (80.8%). Approximately 63% of eyes were accompanied by corneal staining. Superior bulbar conjunctivochalasis was a relatively rare sign (41.6%). Among the five major signs, only the prevalence of SCS gradually increased with its severity. In addition, fluorescein staining at the inferior limbus and adjacent conjunctiva (ICS) was found positive in 163 eyes of 84 patients (36%) who had significantly higher SSI than those without ICS (p = 0.013).

conclusionsWe found that SCS is the most common out of the 5 typical signs of SLK. ICS, a new sign, occurred in one-third of patients. SCS, a simple marker of SLK, as well as SSI, an integrated evaluation system, had the advantage of evaluating the severity and objectively characterizing SLK in clinical practice.

Indexed as

KeratoconjunctivitisLimbus CorneaeScleritisChinaConjunctivaHumansRetrospective StudiesClinical featuresConjunctival stainingSLK scale indexSuperior conjunctival hyperemiaSuperior limbic keratoconjunctivitis

Identifiers

PMID35113250
OpenAlexW4210540684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.