Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113241›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2022

Reliability of a novel approach for reference-based cell type estimation in human placental DNA methylation studies.

Linda Dieckmann, Cristiana Cruceanu, Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen, Jari Lahti, Tuomas Kvist, Hannele Laivuori, Sara Sammallahti, Pia M Villa, Sanna Suomalainen-König, Rebecca C Rancourt and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Linda DieckmannDepartment of Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-0098
Cristiana CruceanuDepartment of Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Marius Lahti-PulkkinenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jari LahtiDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomas KvistDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Hannele LaivuoriInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Human Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Sara SammallahtiDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Pia M VillaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Center for Child, Adolescent and Maternal Health, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Sanna Suomalainen-KönigDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Rebecca C RancourtDepartment of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Andreas PlagemannDepartment of Experimental Obstetrics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Wolfgang HenrichDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Johan G ErikssonDepartment of General Practice, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eero KajantieFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Sonja EntringerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
Thorsten BraunDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany. thorsten.braun@charite.de.
Katri RäikkönenDepartment of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. katri.raikkonen@helsinki.fi.
Elisabeth B Binder *Department of Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Darina Czamara *Department of Translational Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany. darina@psych.mpg.de.
University of Helsinki · FIFreie Universität Berlin · DEMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DEHelsinki University Hospital · FIAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGEmory University · USHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Academy of Finland 1284859Academy of Finland 12848591Academy of Finland 128789Academy of Finland 1287891Academy of Finland 1312670Academy of Finland 1324596Academy of Finland 269925Academy of Finland 311617Academy of Finland 312670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The placenta is a central organ during early development, influencing trajectories of health and disease. DNA methylation (DNAm) studies of human placenta improve our understanding of how its function relates to disease risk. However, DNAm studies can be biased by cell type heterogeneity, so it is essential to control for this in order to reduce confounding and increase precision. Computational cell type deconvolution approaches have proven to be very useful for this purpose. For human placenta, however, an assessment of the performance of these estimation methods is still lacking. Here, we examine the performance of a newly available reference-based cell type estimation approach and compare it to an often-used reference-free cell type estimation approach, namely RefFreeEWAS, in placental genome-wide DNAm samples taken at birth and from chorionic villus biopsies early in pregnancy using three independent studies comprising over 1000 samples. We found both reference-free and reference-based estimated cell type proportions to have predictive value for DNAm, however, reference-based cell type estimation outperformed reference-free estimation for the majority of data sets. Reference-based cell type estimations mirror previous histological knowledge on changes in cell type proportions through gestation. Further, CpGs whose variation in DNAm was largely explained by reference-based estimated cell type proportions were in the proximity of genes that are highly tissue-specific for placenta. This was not the case for reference-free estimated cell type proportions. We provide a list of these CpGs as a resource to help researchers to interpret results of existing studies and improve future DNAm studies of human placenta.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticCpG IslandsFemaleFetal Growth RetardationGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMalePlacentaPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisReproducibility of ResultsCell type estimationChorionic villiDNA methylationHuman placentaReference-based deconvolutionReference-free deconvolution

Identifiers

PMID35113241
PMCPMC8813756
OpenAlexW4210520557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.