Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113224›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform eruption due to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing starting with a very strong or a weak topical corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH1512, colorectal part).

Katsuko Kikuchi, Naoya Yamazaki, Keiko Nozawa, Haruhiko Fukuda, Taro Shibata, Ryunosuke Machida, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Atsuo Takashima, Hirokazu Shoji, Narikazu Boku and 10 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Katsuko KikuchiTohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. kkikuchi@derma.med.tohoku.ac.jp.
Naoya YamazakiDepartment of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko NozawaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mejiro University, Saitama, Japan.
Haruhiko FukudaData Management Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro ShibataBiostatistics Section, Research Management Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryunosuke MachidaBiostatistics Section, Research Management Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya HamaguchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Atsuo TakashimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu ShojiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumiko TakatsukaDepartment of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Tatsuya TakenouchiDepartment of Dermatology, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Tomohiro NishinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Shusuke YoshikawaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto-gun, Japan.
Masanobu TakahashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Akiko HasegawaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Akihito KawazoeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hitoshi MizutaniDepartment of Dermatology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.
Yoshio KiyoharaDermatology Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Sunto-gun, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPShizuoka Cancer Center · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPMejiro University · JPMie University Hospital · JPOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPSaitama Medical University · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPTohoku University · JPTohoku University Hospital · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP17ck0106326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough pre-emptive therapy with oral tetracycline, moisturizer, sunscreen, and topical corticosteroid is useful for preventing acneiform eruption (AfE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, no studies have examined the efficacy of topical corticosteroids themselves, or investigated the optimal potency of corticosteroid for treating facial AfE (FAfE). PATIENTS AND

methodsScreened patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer started pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline and moisturizer on initiation of cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Patients who developed grade 1 or 2 FAfE were randomly allocated to two groups: a ranking-down (RD) group that started with a very strong corticosteroid and serially ranked down every 2 weeks unless FAfE exacerbated; and a ranking-up (RU) group that started with a weak corticosteroid and serially ranked up at exacerbation. FAfE grade, patient quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) with topical corticosteroid were evaluated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of times grade 2 or higher FAfE was identified in the central review of the 8-week treatment period.

resultsNo significant differences in total numbers of grade 2 or higher FAfE or in AEs caused by topical corticosteroids were observed between groups during the 8 weeks. Incidence of grade 2 or higher FAfE tended to be lower in the RD group during the first 2 weeks.

conclusionConsidering the long-term care of FAfE, the RU regimen appears suitable and should be considered the standard treatment for FAfE due to EGFR inhibitor therapy.

trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024113).

Indexed as

Acneiform EruptionsColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCetuximabErbB ReceptorsGlucocorticoidsHumansQuality of LifeCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsGlucocorticoidsAcneiform eruptionAnti-EGFR antibodyColorectal cancerEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)Skin toxicityTopical corticosteroid

Identifiers

PMID35113224
OpenAlexW4221059787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.