Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113188›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2022

A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease.

Zihan Peng, Ying Hong, Yang Meng, Hao Liu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus minimally invasive posterior cervical procedures as motion preserving surgeries for cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of 10-year follow-up result of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc diseases: risk factors for heterotopic ossification.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Artificial intelligence in predicting postoperative heterotopic ossification following anterior cervical disc replacement.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Changes in the centre of rotation and the anterior bone loss of the vertebral body in Mobi-C artificial disc replacement segments after cervical hybrid surgery: a retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Adjacent segment degeneration after single- and double-level cervical total disc replacement: a cohort with an over 12-year follow-up.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  19. Mechanical properties of an elastically deformable cervical spine implant.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zihan PengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Ying HongWest China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yang MengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. drmengyang2010@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-2240
Hao LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. dr.liuhao6304@hotmail.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province 17PJ195Post-Doctor Research Project ,West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2018HXBH002West China Nursing Discipline Development Special Fund Project HXHL19016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is commonly performed to treat cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). The lost of range of motion (ROM) is also found after ACDF, which contributes to degenerate in adjacent segment disease (ASD). Artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR), an alternative to ACDF, is developed to preserve the ROM and reduce ASD. This article aims to compare the outcomes between ACDR and ACDF in the short-, mid-, and long-term.

methodsDatabases including Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched. Only RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, and the search strategy followed the requirements of the Cochrane Handbook. The strength of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each included study and extracted the relevant data.

resultsThirty prospective RCTs were included. Prolonged operative duration, better overall success, neurological success, and NDI success rates were found in ACDR group in all follow-up periods, with lower dysphagia/dysphonia during short-term follow-up. Moreover, a lower ASD was found in ACDR group during long-term follow-up and overall analysis, with lower reoperation rates in all follow-up periods. Comparable length of hospital stay and blood loss were found in both groups. Moreover, ASD was similar in short- and mid-term follow-ups, while dysphagia/dysphonia incidence was similar in mid- and long-term follow-ups. The incidence of implant events was comparable in all follow-up periods (p > 0.05).

conclusionsACDR is as effective as ACDF and superior for some success rates. Disc replacement can reduce the risk of dysphagia/dysphonia, ASD, and re-operation.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersDysphoniaIntervertebral Disc DegenerationSpinal FusionTotal Disc ReplacementCervical VertebraeDiskectomyFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCervical degenerative disc diseaseDisc replacementMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID35113188
OpenAlexW4210547789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.