ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Health Insurance Literacy With Enrollment in Traditional Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and Plan Characteristics Within Medicare Advantage.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preference for supplementary voluntary health insurance and heterogeneity in China: a discrete choice experiment.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Latent profiles of health insurance literacy, numeracy and supplementary voluntary health insurance enrollment.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Health insurance literacy in Israel: gaps between knowledge and use in a universal healthcare system.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Article
- Increasing the Probability of Comparing Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.Health literacy research and practice · 2026Article
- Quantifying Consumer Interest in Medicare Advantage: Development and Usability Study Using Google Trends Data.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Comparing US medicare coverage options as a contributing mechanism to sticking or switching to an insurance plan.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Associations of Medicare Advantage Enrollment Duration with Health Insurance Literacy and Access to and Affordability of Health Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Zero-premium Medicare Advantage plans: trends in areas with socioeconomic vulnerability and health needs.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Addressing complexity: The development and pilot testing of a user-friendly Medicare Part D patient decision aid tool.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025Article
- Financial burden of care greatest among rural beneficiaries in Medicare advantage.Health services research · 2025Article
- Growth Of Chronic Condition Special Needs Plans Among Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries, 2011-24.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2025Article
- The association between health literacy, private health insurance, and medical expenditure in South Korea.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Medicare Resource Use Differs by English Reading Proficiency.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Dental Coverage and Care When Transitioning From Medicaid to Medicare.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Understanding Health Care Disparities Based on Medicare Use for Inflammatory and Infectious Eye Diseases.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- "It shouldn't be like this": Family caregivers navigating insurance for family members with dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Is there an advantage? Considerations for researchers studying the effects of the type of Medicare coverage.Health services research · 2024Review
- Medicare Advantage enrollment by immigration and English proficiency status.The American journal of managed care · 2023Article
- Unmet Need for Medical Care Among Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries with High and Low Need.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Differences between integrated and non-integrated plans in Medicare Advantage.Health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Health insurance literacy helps individuals make informed choices. However, evidence suggests that Medicare beneficiaries experience low health insurance literacy, leading to high-cost or poor-quality coverage choices. Objective: To examine how health insurance literacy was associated with coverage choices between traditional Medicare (TM) and Medicare Advantage (MA), as well as within MA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 6627 TM and MA enrollees, using data from the 2015-2016 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. Data analyses were conducted between May 1 and June 30, 2021. Exposures: Three self-reported measures of health insurance literacy (presence of information to make an informed comparison, ease in reviewing and comparing coverage options, and annual review and comparison of coverage options). Main Outcomes and Measures: Enrollment in TM vs MA and enrollment in an MA plan with different characteristics (star rating, monthly plan premium, in-network maximum out-of-pocket limit, plan type, and provision of supplemental benefits). Results: We included 6627 Medicare beneficiaries (3578 women [54.0%]; mean [SD] age, 75.13 [7.12] years). A total of 77 individuals were Asian (1.2%), 696 were Black (10.5%), 488 were Hispanic (7.4%), 5277 were non-Hispanic White (79.6%), and 225 (3.4%) were single races not of Hispanic origin (including American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian) or were 2 or more races. Medicare Advantage enrollment was higher among individuals with higher health insurance literacy than those with lower health insurance literacy, especially for those who reviewed or compared coverage options annually than among those who did not (38.0%; 95% CI, 36.0%-40.1% vs 27.8%; 95% CI, 25.8%-29.7%). Among MA beneficiaries, those who reviewed or compared coverage options annually were more likely to enroll in plans with 4 to 4.5 stars and plans with monthly premiums of $1 to $50 by 4.6 percentage points (95% CI, 0.1-9.2 percentage points) and 4.8 percentage points (95% CI, 0.6-9.0 percentage points), respectively. However, enrollment in plans with 5 stars was 3.8 percentage points lower (95% CI, -5.8 to -1.9 percentage points) among individuals who reviewed or compared coverage options annually than among those who did not. Among individuals with low socioeconomic status, the likelihood of reviewing or comparing coverage options annually was lower for those with Medicare and Medicaid dual eligibility than for those without it (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that higher health insurance literacy-particularly, annual review and comparison of coverage choices-is associated with higher MA enrollment and choice of a particular MA plan. Policy makers should develop programs to encourage frequent review and comparison of coverage options for informed decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.