Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35113025›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2022

Improving Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Adherence Among Pregnant Women: Validation Study.

Aida Jaffar, Sherina Mohd-Sidik, Chai Nien Foo, Novia Admodisastro, Sobihatun Nur Abdul Salam, Noor Diana Ismail

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04762433 (Parallel-Group, Randomised Single-centred, Single-blind, Pilot and Feasibility Study for KEPT-app Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04762433 nacompletednot on this map

Parallel-Group, Randomised Single-centred, Single-blind, Pilot and Feasibility Study for KEPT-app Trial: Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled26ConditionsPregnancy Related, Urinary IncontinenceArmsKegel Exercise Pregnancy Training - app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aida JaffarDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-9509
Sherina Mohd-SidikDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6754-6145
Chai Nien FooDepartment of Population Medicine, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0362-6394
Novia AdmodisastroSoftware Engineering & Information System Department, Faculty of Computer Science & Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1715-946X
Sobihatun Nur Abdul SalamSchool of Multimedia Technology and Communication, College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6751-9187
Noor Diana IsmailKlinik Kesihatan Bt 9 Cheras, Ministry of Health, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-3026
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYMinistry of Health · MYNorthern University of Malaysia · MYUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile health apps, for example, the Tät, have been shown to be potentially effective in improving pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) among women, but they have not yet been studied among pregnant women. Adherence to daily PFMT will improve pelvic floor muscle strength leading to urinary incontinence (UI) improvement during the pregnancy.

objectiveThis study aims to document the validation process in developing the Kegel Exercise Pregnancy Training app, which was designed to improve the PFMT adherence among pregnant women.

methodsWe utilized an intervention mapping approach incorporated within the mobile health development and evaluation framework. The framework involved the following steps: (1) conceptualization, (2) formative research, (3) pretesting, (4) pilot testing, (5) randomized controlled trial, and (6) qualitative research. The user-centered design-11 checklist was used to evaluate the user-centeredness properties of the app.

resultsA cross-sectional study was conducted to better understand PFMT and UI among 440 pregnant women. The study reported a UI prevalence of 40.9% (180/440), with less than half having good PFMT practice despite their good knowledge. Five focus group discussions were conducted to understand the app design preferred by pregnant women. They agreed a more straightforward design should be used for better app usability. From these findings, a prototype was designed and developed accordingly, and the process conformed to the user-centered design-11 (UCD-11) checklist. A PFMT app was developed based on the mHealth development and evaluation framework model, emphasizing higher user involvement in the application design and development. The application was expected to improve its usability, acceptability, and ease of use.

conclusionsThe Kegel Exercise Pregnancy Training app was validated using a thorough design and development process to ensure its effectiveness in evaluating the usability of the final prototype in our future randomized control trial study.

Indexed as

AcceptabilityDigital interventionmHealth appmHealth Development and Evaluation FrameworkPelvic Floor Muscle TrainingPregnancyUrinary incontinenceUsabilityUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID35113025
PMCPMC8855292
OpenAlexW4210773753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.