Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112973›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2022

COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among immunocompromised populations: a targeted literature review of real-world studies.

Manuela Di Fusco, Jay Lin, Shailja Vaghela, Melissa Lingohr-Smith, Jennifer L Nguyen, Thomas Scassellati Sforzolini, Jennifer Judy, Alejandro Cane, Mary M Moran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy in Participants With Weakened Immune Systems From 4 Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manuela Di FuscoPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0079-7331
Jay LinNovosys Health, Green Brook, NJ, USA.
Shailja VaghelaHealthEcon Consulting Inc., Ancaster, ON, Canada.
Melissa Lingohr-SmithNovosys Health, Green Brook, NJ, USA.
Jennifer L NguyenPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Thomas Scassellati SforzoliniPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer JudyPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Alejandro CanePfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Mary M MoranPfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrom July through October of 2021, several countries issued recommendations for increased COVID-19 vaccine protection for individuals with one or more immunocompromised (IC) conditions. It is critically important to understand the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of COVID-19 vaccines among IC populations as recommendations are updated over time in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. AREAS COVERED: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify real-world studies that assessed COVID-19 VE in IC populations between December 2020 and September 2021. A total of 10 studies from four countries were identified and summarized in this review. EXPERT OPINION: VE of the widely available COVID-19 vaccines, including BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford/AstraZeneca), ranged from 64% to 90% against SARS-CoV-2 infection, 73% to 84% against symptomatic illness, 70% to 100% against severe illness, and 63% to 100% against COVID-19-related hospitalization among the fully vaccinated IC populations included in the studies. COVID-19 VE for most outcomes in the IC populations included in these studies were lower than in the general populations. These findings provide preliminary evidence that the IC population requires greater protective measures to prevent COVID-19 infection and associated illness, hence should be prioritized while implementing recommendations of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAd26COVS1BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyAd26COVS1BNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19-related hospitalizationCOVID-19 vaccinesimmunocompromisedSARS-CoV-2 infectionsymptomatic COVID-19 illnessvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID35112973
PMCPMC8862165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.