Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112513›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022

Reproducibility of identical solid phantoms.

Fangzhou Zhao, Pietro Levoni, Lorenzo Frabasile, Hong Qi, Michele Lacerenza, Pranav Lanka, Alessandro Torricelli, Antonio Pifferi, Rinaldo Cubeddu, Lorenzo Spinelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-invasive estimation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fangzhou ZhaoPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Pietro LevoniPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo FrabasilePolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Hong QiHarbin Institute of Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin, China.
Michele LacerenzaPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Pranav LankaPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Alessandro TorricelliPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Antonio PifferiPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Rinaldo CubedduPolitecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo SpinelliInstituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie (IFN), Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceTissue-like solid phantoms with identical optical properties, known within tolerant uncertainty, are of crucial importance in diffuse optics for instrumentation assessment, interlaboratory comparison studies, industrial standards, and multicentric clinical trials.

aimThe reproducibility in fabrication of homogeneous solid phantoms is focused based on spectra measurements by instrument comparisons grounded on the time-resolved diffuse optics. APPROACH: Epoxy-resin and silicone phantoms are considered as matrices and both employ three different instruments for time-resolved diffuse spectroscopy within the spectral range of 540 to 1100 nm. In particular, we fabricated two batches of five phantoms each in epoxy resin and silicone. Then, we evaluated the intra- and interbatch variability with respect to the instrument precision, by considering the coefficient of variation (CV) of absorption and reduced scattering coefficients.

resultsWe observed a similar precision for the three instruments, within 2% for repeated measurements on the same phantom. For epoxy-resin phantoms, the intra- and the interbatch variability reached the instrument precision limit, demonstrating a very good phantom reproducibility. For the silicone phantoms, we observed larger values for intra- and interbatch variability. In particular, at worst, for reduced scattering coefficient interbatch CV was about 5%.

conclusionsResults suggest that the fabrication of solid phantoms, especially considering epoxy-resin matrix, is highly reproducible, even if they come from different batch fabrications and are measured using different instruments.

Indexed as

Optics and PhotonicsSiliconesPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSpectrum AnalysisSiliconesinstrument comparisonphantom reproducibilitytime-resolved diffuse opticstissue-like solid phantoms

Identifiers

PMID35112513
PMCPMC8809200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.