ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2022
Reproducibility of identical solid phantoms.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of analytical models to estimate depth of fluorescence objects in biological media.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Phantom for standardization in functional near-infrared spectroscopy, part 2: optical properties and Monte Carlo simulations.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- "hDOS": an automated hybrid diffuse optical device for real-time noninvasive tissue monitoring: precision andJournal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Inter-phantom variability in digital mammography: implications for quality control.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Challenging the skin pigmentation bias in tissue oximetry via time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Use of bioresorbable fibers for short-wave infrared spectroscopy using time-domain diffuse optics.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Application of transfer learning for rapid calibration of spatially resolved diffuse reflectance probes for extraction of tissue optical properties.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Time domain diffuse Raman spectroscopy using single pixel detection.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Non-invasive estimation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
significanceTissue-like solid phantoms with identical optical properties, known within tolerant uncertainty, are of crucial importance in diffuse optics for instrumentation assessment, interlaboratory comparison studies, industrial standards, and multicentric clinical trials.
aimThe reproducibility in fabrication of homogeneous solid phantoms is focused based on spectra measurements by instrument comparisons grounded on the time-resolved diffuse optics. APPROACH: Epoxy-resin and silicone phantoms are considered as matrices and both employ three different instruments for time-resolved diffuse spectroscopy within the spectral range of 540 to 1100 nm. In particular, we fabricated two batches of five phantoms each in epoxy resin and silicone. Then, we evaluated the intra- and interbatch variability with respect to the instrument precision, by considering the coefficient of variation (CV) of absorption and reduced scattering coefficients.
resultsWe observed a similar precision for the three instruments, within 2% for repeated measurements on the same phantom. For epoxy-resin phantoms, the intra- and the interbatch variability reached the instrument precision limit, demonstrating a very good phantom reproducibility. For the silicone phantoms, we observed larger values for intra- and interbatch variability. In particular, at worst, for reduced scattering coefficient interbatch CV was about 5%.
conclusionsResults suggest that the fabrication of solid phantoms, especially considering epoxy-resin matrix, is highly reproducible, even if they come from different batch fabrications and are measured using different instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.