Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112442›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

Cultural adaptation of a community-based advance serious illness planning decision aid to the Quebec context involving end-users.

Ariane Plaisance, Yoanna Skrobik, Mathieu Moreau, Felix Pageau, Diane Tapp, Daren K Heyland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cultural adaptation of a community-based advance serious illness planning decision aid to the Quebec context involving end-users.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ariane PlaisanceFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-7650
Yoanna SkrobikFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5315-6020
Mathieu MoreauCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Felix PageauFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9794-1194
Diane TappFaculty of Nursing, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-0141
Daren K HeylandDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-4616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTraditional advance care planning focuses on end-of-life planning in the context of a certain or imminent death. It is not tailored for serious illness planning, where the 'death' outcome is uncertain. The Plan Well Guide™ (PWG) is a decision aid that empowers lay persons to better understand different types of care and prepares them, and their substitute decision-makers, to express both their authentic values and informed treatment preferences in anticipation of serious illness. A cultural adaptation was necessary to make the material suitable to the context of Quebec, a French-speaking Canadian province.

methodsWe engaged lay collaborators and experts in a panel, involving three phases of consultation and data collection. These included an online questionnaire, focused interviews and virtual focus groups that identified elements within the francophone PWG affecting its feasibility, adaptation and integration, as well as items that should be modified.

resultsWe engaged 22 collaborators between April and September 2021. The majority (82%) ranked the first translation as good or very good; most (70%) stated that they would recommend the final adaptation. Both lay and expert panel members suggested simplifying the language and framing the tool better within the context of other advance medical planning processes in Quebec. Translation was considered in a cultural context; the challenges identified by the research team or by collaborators were addressed during the focus group. Examples of wording that required discussion include translating 'getting the medical care that's right for you' when referring to the PWG's goal. An equivalent expression in the French translation was believed to invoke religious associations. Using the term 'machines' to describe life-sustaining treatments was also deliberated.

conclusionOur collaborative iterative adaptation process led to the first French advanced serious illness planning tool. How acceptable and user-friendly this French adaptation of the PWG is in various Canadian French-speaking environments requires further study. CONTRIBUTION: We organized a focus group inviting both lay collaborators and experts to contribute to the interpretation of the results of the previous phases. This choice allowed us to add more value to our results and to the final PWG in French.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCanadaDecision Support TechniquesHumansQuebecSurveys and Questionnairesadvance care planningadvance serious illness planningcultural adaptationdecision aid toolsend-users involvement end-of-life care

Identifiers

PMID35112442
PMCPMC9122389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.