SynthesisPharmacoEconomics2022
Economic and Humanistic Burden of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scalable outpatient framework for BI-RADS 2-4B breast nodule management: an iodine-DMSO transdermal protocol.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Economic burden of five common cancers in Iran: a systematic review of cost-of-illness with a focus on healthcare resource utilization.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the clinical, humanistic, and economic impact of early cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical, humanistic and economic burden associated with recurrence among patients with early-stage cancers: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Recurrence detection in patients with triple-negative breast cancer following the current standard of care: a microsimulation model.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Biological basis and clinical translation prospects of circulating cell-free DNA in precision management of breast cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Kaiso modulates androgen receptor expression in triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Botulinum Neurotoxin-A Inhibits Tumor Growth in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Preclinical Model.Toxins · 2026Article
- Lines Left Uncrossed: The Cost of Attrition in Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Sacituzumab Govitecan and Physician's Choice of Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer in Spain.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Breast cancer and income loss in Denmark: heterogeneous outcomes and longitudinal effects.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Unveiled: Bridging Science, Treatment Strategy, and Economic Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A US Survey Across Seven Early-Stage Cancers Assessing the Humanistic Burden of Recurrence on Patients and Caregivers.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Burden of Disease and Cost of Illness of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Portugal.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Review
- Impact of recurrence on employment, finances, and productivity for early-stage cancer patients and caregivers: US survey.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Review
- Treatment Patterns, Clinical Events, and Costs of Care for Patients With Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Retrospective US Claims Database Study.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2025Article
- Article
- A Narrative Review of the Clinical, Humanistic, and Economic Value of Pembrolizumab-Based Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Breast and Gynecologic Cancers.Oncology and therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all breast cancers (BCs). It is more commonly diagnosed in younger women and often has a less favorable prognosis compared with other BC subtypes.
objectiveThe objective of this study was to provide a literature-based extensive overview of the economic and humanistic burden of TNBC to assist medical decisions for healthcare payers, providers, and patients.
methodsA systematic literature review was performed using multiple databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Econlit, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from database inception to 16 May 2021. In addition, a targeted search was performed in the Northern Light Life Sciences Conference Abstracts database from 2016 through June 2021. The bibliographies of included articles were reviewed to identify other potentially relevant publications. Quality assessment of the included studies was conducted.
resultsThe review identified 19 studies assessing the economic burden and 10 studies assessing the humanistic burden of TNBC. Studies varied widely in study design, settings, patient populations, and time horizons. The estimates of mean per-patient annual direct medical costs ranged from around $20,000 to over $100,000 in stage I-III TNBC and from $100,000 to $300,000 in stage IV TNBC. Healthcare costs and resource utilization increased significantly with disease recurrence, progression, and increased cancer stage or line of therapy. Compared with the costs of systemic anticancer therapy, cancer management costs comprised a larger portion of total direct costs. The estimates of indirect costs due to productivity loss ranged from $207 to $1573 per patient per month (all costs presented above were adjusted to 2021 US dollars). Cancer recurrence led to significantly reduced productivity and greater rates of leaving the workforce. A rapid deterioration of health utility associated with disease progression was observed in TNBC patients. Treatment with pembrolizumab or talazoparib showed significantly greater improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared with chemotherapy, as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR23, and FACT-B.
conclusionTNBC is associated with a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems and societies and considerably reduced productivity and HRQoL for patients. This study synthesized the published literature on the economic and humanistic burden of TNBC and highlighted the need for continued research due to the rapidly changing landscape of TNBC care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.