Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35112265›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2022

State-of-the-art review on management of end-stage heart failure in amyloidosis: transplant and beyond.

Salil Kumar, Daniel Li, Denny Joseph, Barry Trachtenberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Salil KumarHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel LiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Denny JosephDepartment of Internal Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Barry TrachtenbergHouston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. btrachtenberg@houstonmethodist.org.
Methodist Hospital · USHouston Methodist · USMethodist Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac involvement occurs in light-chain (AL), transthyretin wild-type (wtATTR), and hereditary (hATTR) amyloidosis; other types of amyloidosis account for < 5% of all cardiac amyloidosis (CA). CA can present subclinically on screening, insidiously with symptoms such as exertional dyspnea, or abruptly as cardiogenic shock. Initially, CA patients were thought to be poor candidates for transplant due to short long-term survival; however, there is a marked improvement in heart and multi-organ transplant outcomes over the past 10 years with newer treatments and improvements in support with temporary and durable mechanical circulatory support while awaiting transplant. Patients with AL CA were reported to have worse post-OHT outcomes than patients with ATTR CA, but this gap is quickly closing with improved patient selection, novel chemotherapeutics, and perhaps with selected use of bone marrow transplantation. Waitlist mortality and transplantation rates have markedly improved for CA after the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) policy change in October 2018. In this review, we will evaluate contemporary data from the last 5 years on advances in the field of transplantation and mechanical circulatory support in this patient population.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHumansAmyloidosisMechanical circulatory supportTotal artificial heartTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID35112265
OpenAlexW4210798470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.